These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Comparison of WAIS and WAIS-R scores of mildly and moderately mentally retarded adults. Simon CL, Clopton JR. Am J Ment Defic; 1984 Nov; 89(3):301-3. PubMed ID: 6517112 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Concurrent validity study of the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised in mental retardation testing. Kunen S, Overstreet S, Salles C. Ment Retard; 1996 Dec; 34(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 8990822 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Differential WAIS/WAIS-R IQ discrepancies among institutionalized mentally retarded persons. Goldman JJ. Am J Ment Defic; 1987 May; 91(6):633-5. PubMed ID: 3591850 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Inadequacy of brief IQ measures in the classification of mentally retarded prisoners. Thompson HJ, Roberts RN, Whiddon MF. Am J Ment Defic; 1979 Jan; 83(4):416-7. PubMed ID: 420267 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Ratio developmental quotients from the Bayley are comparable to later IQs from the Stanford-Binet. Goldstein DJ, Sheaffer CI. Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Jan; 92(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 3342140 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The Stanford-Binet: Fourth Edition and form L-M in assessment of young children with mental retardation. Wilson WM. Ment Retard; 1992 Apr; 30(2):81-4. PubMed ID: 1584032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition and the WISC--R for children in the lower range of intelligence. Lukens J. Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Jun; 70(3 Pt 1):819-22. PubMed ID: 2377415 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Validity of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale-IV: its use in young adults with mental retardation. Nelson WM, Dacey CM. Ment Retard; 1999 Aug; 37(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 10463026 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reliability and validity of ratio developmental quotients from the Cattell Infant Intelligence Scale. Atkinson L. Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Sep; 95(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 1699557 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential validity of the K-ABC for lower functioning preschool children versus those of higher ability. Bloom AS, Allard AM, Zelko FA, Brill WJ, Topinka CW, Pfohl W. Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Nov; 93(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 3228519 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimizing test performance of moderately and severely mentally retarded adolescents and adults. Budoff M, Hamilton JL. Am J Ment Defic; 1976 Jul; 81(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 941933 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Intellectual evaluations of children using human figure drawings: an empirical investigation of two methods. Abell SC, von Briesen PD, Watz LS. J Clin Psychol; 1996 Jan; 52(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 8682914 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Relations of scores on the Stanford Binet Fourth Edition and form L-M: concurrent validation study with children who have mental retardation. Bower A, Hayes A. Am J Ment Retard; 1995 Mar; 99(5):555-8. PubMed ID: 7779350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Uses of Rasch scaling in the measurement of cognitive development and growth. Roid GH, Woodcock RW. J Outcome Meas; 2000 Mar; 4(2):579-94. PubMed ID: 11272618 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Intellectual and adaptive functioning: some tables for interpreting the Vineland in combination with intelligence tests. Atkinson L. Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Sep; 95(2):198-203. PubMed ID: 2223027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]