These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

263 related items for PubMed ID: 3957726

  • 21. Comparison of hearing thresholds obtained using pure-tone behavioral audiometry, the Cantonese Hearing in Noise Test (CHINT) and cortical evoked response audiometry.
    Wong LL, Cheung C, Wong EC.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 128(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 18568500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. [Diagnosis of central hearing disorders in childhood].
    Nickisch A.
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1988 Jun; 67(6):312-5. PubMed ID: 3405032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. [Prediction of speech audiometry as compared to pure-tone audiometry in the estimation of the importance of noise].
    De Heyn G.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1986 Jun; 40(4):615-27. PubMed ID: 3799179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A, Walliker JR, Howard IS, Ball V, Fourcin AJ.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Jun; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Audiometric evaluation of bilaterally fitted bone-anchored hearing aids.
    Bosman AJ, Snik AF, van der Pouw CT, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW.
    Audiology; 2001 Jun; 40(3):158-67. PubMed ID: 11465298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation.
    Priwin C, Stenfelt S, Granström G, Tjellström A, Håkansson B.
    Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 14709999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. [Comparative speech audiometry examinations with compact disk and cassette tape].
    Doerr L.
    HNO; 1994 Aug; 42(8):493-8. PubMed ID: 7960952
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Integrating the acoustics of running speech into the pure tone audiogram: a step from audibility to intelligibility and disability.
    Corthals P.
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2008 Aug; 60(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18057908
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. [Self assessment and actual intelligibility of speech audiometry test material].
    Klotz B, Kumpf W.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1995 Oct; 74(10):591-3. PubMed ID: 8672196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Bone-conduction speech reception thresholds with the mentally retarded.
    Johnson CW, Bordenick RM.
    J Aud Res; 1978 Jul; 18(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 755820
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. The effectiveness of binaural hearing aids.
    Markides A.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982 Jul; 15():181-96. PubMed ID: 6955925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Low-frequency sensorineural loss: clinical evaluation and implications for hearing aid fitting.
    Halpin C, Thornton A, Hasso M.
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 8194681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E, Samuelsson E, Danermark B, Rönnberg J.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999 Jun; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Hearing assessment in pre-school children with speech delay.
    Psillas G, Psifidis A, Antoniadou-Hitoglou M, Kouloulas A.
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2006 Sep; 33(3):259-63. PubMed ID: 16420975
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Electroacoustic evaluation of frequency-modulated receivers interfaced with personal hearing aids.
    Schafer EC, Thibodeau LM, Whalen HS, Overson GJ.
    Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch; 2007 Oct; 38(4):315-26. PubMed ID: 17890512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. The influence of the guess factor on the speech reception threshold.
    Burke LE, Nerbonne MA.
    J Am Aud Soc; 1978 Oct; 4(3):87-90. PubMed ID: 299592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.