These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

85 related items for PubMed ID: 3958996

  • 1. Multichannel syllabic compression for severely impaired listeners.
    De Gennaro S, Braida LD, Durlach NI.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 3958996
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Multiband compression limiting for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bustamante DK, Braida LD.
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Jan; 24(4):149-60. PubMed ID: 3430374
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners.
    Rosengard PS, Payton KL, Braida LD.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 48(3):702-14. PubMed ID: 16197282
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Understanding compression: modeling the effects of dynamic-range compression in hearing aids.
    Kates JM.
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 49(6):395-409. PubMed ID: 20225931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A, Walliker JR, Howard IS, Ball V, Fourcin AJ.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Jun; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS, Kreft HA.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Effects of audibility and multichannel wide dynamic range compression on consonant recognition for listeners with severe hearing loss.
    Davies-Venn E, Souza P, Brennan M, Stecker GC.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):494-504. PubMed ID: 19633563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM, van Dijkhuizen JN, Plomp R.
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993 Oct; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Noise, amplification, and compression: considerations of three main issues in hearing aid design.
    Plomp R.
    Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):2-12. PubMed ID: 8194676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effects of hearing loss and spectral shaping on identification and neural response patterns of stop-consonant stimuli in young adults.
    Harkrider AW, Plyler PN, Hedrick MS.
    Ear Hear; 2009 Feb; 30(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 19125025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A psychophysical evaluation of spectral enhancement.
    DiGiovanni JJ, Nelson PB, Schlauch RS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Oct; 48(5):1121-35. PubMed ID: 16411801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Effect of single-channel compression on temporal speech information.
    Souza PE, Turner CW.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 39(5):901-11. PubMed ID: 8898245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech discrimination and effectiveness of hearing aids under listening conditions similar to those of a transit operator.
    Lee LA, Chung DY, Gannon RP.
    J Otolaryngol; 1981 Jun; 10(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 7277564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL, Studebaker GA.
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Perceptual weighting of stop consonant cues by normal and impaired listeners in reverberation versus noise.
    Hedrick MS, Younger MS.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):254-69. PubMed ID: 17463228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
    Davidson LS.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Using multichannel wide-dynamic range compression in severely hearing-impaired listeners: effects on speech recognition and quality.
    Souza PE, Jenstad LM, Folino R.
    Ear Hear; 2005 Apr; 26(2):120-31. PubMed ID: 15809540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Ranking hearing aid input-output functions for understanding low-, conversational-, and high-level speech in multitalker babble.
    Chung K, Killion MC, Christensen LA.
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Apr; 50(2):304-22. PubMed ID: 17463231
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.