These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Quantifying the contribution of audibility to recognition of compression-amplified speech. Souza PE, Turner CW. Ear Hear; 1999 Feb; 20(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 10037062 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Study of multichannel amplitude compression and linear amplification for persons with sensorineural hearing loss. Lippmann RP, Braida LD, Durlach NI. J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Feb; 69(2):524-34. PubMed ID: 7462475 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Multichannel compression processing for profound deafness. Villchur E. J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987 Feb; 24(4):135-48. PubMed ID: 3430373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Measuring the long-term SNRs of static and adaptive compression amplification techniques for speech in noise. Lai YH, Li PC, Tsai KS, Chu WC, Young ST. J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):671-83. PubMed ID: 24131603 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The role of spectral resolution, working memory, and audibility in explaining variance in susceptibility to temporal envelope distortion. Davies-Venn E, Souza P. J Am Acad Audiol; 2014 Jun; 25(6):592-604. PubMed ID: 25313549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of three amplification strategies on speech perception by children with severe and profound hearing loss. Marriage JE, Moore BC, Stone MA, Baer T. Ear Hear; 2005 Feb; 26(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 15692303 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Amplification bandwidth and speech intelligibility for two listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Skinner MW, Karstaedt MM, Miller JD. Audiology; 1982 Feb; 21(3):251-68. PubMed ID: 7092728 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Visual Cues Contribute Differentially to Audiovisual Perception of Consonants and Vowels in Improving Recognition and Reducing Cognitive Demands in Listeners With Hearing Impairment Using Hearing Aids. Moradi S, Lidestam B, Danielsson H, Ng EHN, Rönnberg J. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2017 Sep 18; 60(9):2687-2703. PubMed ID: 28651255 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Principal-component amplitude compression for the hearing impaired. Bustamante DK, Braida LD. J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Oct 18; 82(4):1227-42. PubMed ID: 3680780 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Compression systems for hearing aids and cochlear prostheses. White MW. J Rehabil Res Dev; 1986 Jan 18; 23(1):25-39. PubMed ID: 3754282 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Perception of aspiration and place of articulation of Cantonese initial stops by normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired listeners. Tsui IY, Ciocca V. Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2000 Jan 18; 35(4):507-25. PubMed ID: 11091821 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Fitting low ratio compression to people with severe and profound hearing losses. Barker C, Dillon H, Newall P. Ear Hear; 2001 Apr 18; 22(2):130-41. PubMed ID: 11324842 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Consequences of broad auditory filters for identification of multichannel-compressed vowels. Souza P, Wright R, Bor S. J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2012 Apr 18; 55(2):474-86. PubMed ID: 22207696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Consonant perception in quiet: effect of increasing the consonant-vowel ratio with compression amplification. Hickson L, Byrne D. J Am Acad Audiol; 1997 Oct 18; 8(5):322-32. PubMed ID: 9328894 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Acoustic analysis of speech through a hearing aid: consonant-vowel ratio effects with two-channel compression amplification. Hickson L, Thyer N, Bates D. J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 Oct 18; 10(10):549-56. PubMed ID: 10613351 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of specific compression settings on phoneme identification in hearing-impaired subjects. Dreschler WA. Scand Audiol; 1988 Oct 18; 17(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 3406659 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Effects of amplification and speechreading on consonant recognition by persons with impaired hearing. Walden BE, Grant KW, Cord MT. Ear Hear; 2001 Aug 18; 22(4):333-41. PubMed ID: 11527039 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Syllabic compression: effective compression ratios for signals modulated at different rates. Stone MA, Moore BC. Br J Audiol; 1992 Dec 18; 26(6):351-61. PubMed ID: 1292819 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Design of two syllabic nonlinear multichannel signal processors and the results of speech tests in noise. van Harten-de Bruijn HE, van Kreveld-Bos CS, Dreschler WA, Verschuure H. Ear Hear; 1997 Feb 18; 18(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 9058035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]