These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

144 related items for PubMed ID: 3959941

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Internal cardiac defibrillation: single and sequential pulses and a variety of lead orientations.
    Jones DL, Klein GJ, Rattes MF, Sohla A, Sharma AD.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1988 May; 11(5):583-91. PubMed ID: 2456537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Nonthoracotomy internal defibrillation in dogs using a body surface electrode with a transvenous catheter electrode].
    Yotsukura A.
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1989 Jul; 64(4):450-6. PubMed ID: 2583666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of defibrillation probability of success curves for an endocardial lead configuration with and without an inactive epicardial patch.
    Callihan RL, Idriss SF, Dahl RW, Wolf PD, Smith WM, Ideker RE.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1995 May; 25(6):1373-9. PubMed ID: 7722136
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Influence of epicardial patches on defibrillation threshold with nonthoracotomy lead configurations.
    Fotuhi PC, Ideker RE, Idriss SF, Callihan RL, Walker RG, Alt EU.
    Circulation; 1995 Nov 15; 92(10):3082-8. PubMed ID: 7586279
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bidirectional transvenous/subcutaneous defibrillation of ventricular fibrillation in dogs: success rates, energy requirements, currents, voltages and impedance.
    Budde T, Vukmirovic NB, Soriano-Romero JM, Abu-Ghazaleh S, Borggrefe M, Schmiel FK, Pölitz B, Arnold G, Breithardt G.
    Eur Heart J; 1988 Jan 15; 9(1):92-101. PubMed ID: 3345775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Sequential pulse defibrillation in man: comparison of thresholds in normal subjects and those with cardiac disease.
    Jones DL, Klein GJ, Guiraudon GM, Sharma AD, Kallok MJ, Tacker WA, Bourland JD.
    Med Instrum; 1987 Jun 15; 21(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 3614039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Effect of rapid biphasic shock subpulse switching on ventricular defibrillation thresholds.
    Dosdall DJ, Rothe DE, Brandon TA, Sweeney JD.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jul 15; 15(7):802-8. PubMed ID: 15250866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Intraoperative comparison of sequential-pulse and single-pulse defibrillation in candidates for automatic implantable defibrillators.
    Bardy GH, Stewart RB, Ivey TD, Graham EL, Adhar GC, Greene HL.
    Am J Cardiol; 1987 Sep 01; 60(7):618-24. PubMed ID: 3630945
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of acute coronary artery occlusion on direct ventricular defibrillation in dogs.
    Ruffy R, Schwartz DJ, Hieb BR.
    Med Instrum; 1980 Sep 01; 14(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 7354732
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Sequential pulse defibrillation in humans: orthogonal sequential pulse defibrillation with epicardial electrodes.
    Jones DL, Klein GJ, Guiraudon GM, Sharma AD.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1988 Mar 01; 11(3):590-6. PubMed ID: 3343463
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Prospective comparison of sequential pulse and single pulse defibrillation with use of two different clinically available systems.
    Bardy GH, Ivey TD, Allen MD, Johnson G, Greene HL.
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1989 Jul 01; 14(1):165-71. PubMed ID: 2738261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Low-energy endocardial defibrillation using dual, triple, and quadruple electrode systems.
    Munsif AN, Saksena S, DeGroot P, Krol RB, Matthew P, Giorgberidze I, Kaushik RR, Mehra R.
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Jun 15; 79(12):1632-9. PubMed ID: 9202354
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Position of epicardial patch electrodes for implantable defibrillation significantly affects shock strength requirements.
    KenKnight BH, Heil JE, Hahn SJ, Lang DJ.
    Acad Emerg Med; 1995 Jan 15; 2(1):50-5, discussion 55-6. PubMed ID: 7606614
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Passive electrode effect reduces defibrillation threshold in bi-filament middle cardiac vein defibrillation.
    Paisey JR, Yue AM, Bessoule F, Roberts PR, Morgan JM.
    Europace; 2006 Feb 15; 8(2):113-7. PubMed ID: 16627420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of pulse separation between two sequential biphasic shocks given over different lead configurations on ventricular defibrillation efficacy.
    Johnson EE, Alferness CA, Wolf PD, Smith WM, Ideker RE.
    Circulation; 1992 Jun 15; 85(6):2267-74. PubMed ID: 1591840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Transseptal defibrillation is superior for transvenous defibrillation.
    Singer I, Goldsmith J, Maldonado C.
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1995 Jan 15; 18(1 Pt 2):229-32. PubMed ID: 7724405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.