These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
50 related items for PubMed ID: 3969770
1. [Variant of the quantitative evaluation of hearing function based on the data from speech audiometry]. Tokarev OP, Morozov AB. Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1985; (1):25-7. PubMed ID: 3969770 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Hearing in the elderly: a population study. Martini A, Mazzoli M, Rosignoli M, Trevisi P, Maggi S, Enzi G, Crepaldi G. Audiology; 2001; 40(6):285-93. PubMed ID: 11781040 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Layouts of tone audibility zones and speech audiometry indices corresponding to definite distances in the perception of "live" speech by cochlear neuritis patients]. Shidlovskaia TV, Sachenko SV, Stepaneko OA. Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1978; (5):5-9. PubMed ID: 706758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Acceptable range of speech level for both young and aged listeners in reverberant and quiet sound fields. Sato H, Sato H, Morimoto M, Ota R. J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Sep; 122(3):1616. PubMed ID: 17927421 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity of hearing to low-frequency amplitude modulation in normal and deaf children. Chernigovskaya TV. Hum Physiol; 1979 Sep; 4(2):236-9. PubMed ID: 447345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Speech perception in old age]. Krüger B. Z Gerontol; 1980 Sep; 13(2):120-48. PubMed ID: 7210783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study. Morera C, Manrique M, Ramos A, Garcia-Ibanez L, Cavalle L, Huarte A, Castillo C, Estrada E. Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid. Plomp R, Duquesnoy AJ. Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982 Jun; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech recognition in patients after successful surgery for unilateral congenital ear anomalies. Snik FM, Teunissen B, Cremers WR. Laryngoscope; 1994 Aug; 104(8 Pt 1):1029-34. PubMed ID: 8052068 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Choice of criteria for classifying the forms of hearing loss applicable to the aims of hearing aids]. Bazarov VG, Moroz BS, Tishchenko NI, Gekht IuK. Vestn Otorinolaringol; 1981 Aug; (4):21-6. PubMed ID: 7303367 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of preoperative residual hearing on speech perception after cochlear implantation. Adunka OF, Buss E, Clark MS, Pillsbury HC, Buchman CA. Laryngoscope; 2008 Nov; 118(11):2044-9. PubMed ID: 18813141 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Audiological application criteria for implantable hearing aid devices: a clinical experience at the Nijmegen ORL clinic. Verhaegen VJ, Mylanus EA, Cremers CW, Snik AF. Laryngoscope; 2008 Sep; 118(9):1645-9. PubMed ID: 18677283 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Band filtration of the speech signal: speech perception in health status and in sensorineural hearing loss]. Petrov SM. Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2000 Sep; (3):55-6. PubMed ID: 10846492 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]