These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

112 related items for PubMed ID: 3971739

  • 1. Viscosity of iodinated contrast agents: significance for peripheral venous injection.
    Mitchell DG, Friedman AC.
    J Comput Tomogr; 1985 Jan; 9(1):77-8. PubMed ID: 3971739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Why does kidney size change during I.V. urography?
    Dorph S, Sovak M, Talner LB, Rosen L.
    Invest Radiol; 1977 Jan; 12(3):246-50. PubMed ID: 863628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Acceptability of oral iodinated contrast media: a head-to-head comparison of four media.
    Pollentine A, Ngan-Soo E, McCoubrie P.
    Br J Radiol; 2013 May; 86(1025):20120636. PubMed ID: 23564884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Doses of contrast media.
    Davies P.
    Lancet; 1978 Mar 11; 1(8063):556-7. PubMed ID: 76097
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of the excretion of sodium and meglumine diatrizoate at urography with simulated compression: an experimental study in the rat.
    Owman T.
    Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh); 1981 Jul 11; 49(1):21-7. PubMed ID: 7336961
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Adverse reactions to urographic contrast medium. Rapid versus slow injection rate.
    Jensen N, Dorph S.
    Br J Radiol; 1980 Jul 11; 53(631):659-61. PubMed ID: 7426887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Injection times and tolerance of various contrast media in urographic and angiographic studies].
    Canigiani G, Deimer E, Wolf G.
    Rontgenpraxis; 1974 Dec 11; 27(12):273-81. PubMed ID: 4450149
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Product selection criteria for intravascular ionic contrast media.
    Swanson DP, Dick TJ, Simms SM, Thrall JH.
    Clin Pharm; 1985 Dec 11; 4(5):527-38. PubMed ID: 3902331
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Gadopentetate dimeglumine and iodinated contrast media. Hemodynamic side effects after bolus injections in pigs.
    Kuhtz-Buschbeck JP, Ehrhardt K, Köhnlein S, Radtke W, Heintzen P.
    Invest Radiol; 1997 Feb 11; 32(2):111-9. PubMed ID: 9039584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. NOTE ON INTRAVENOUS PYELOGRAPHY WITH 66.8 PER CENT SODIUM IOTHALAMATE; CONRAY-400, IODINE CONTENT 40 PER CENT.
    STEINBERG I, EVANS JA.
    Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1964 Aug 11; 92():267-9. PubMed ID: 14207569
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.