These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Papanicolaou smears without endocervical cells. Are they inadequate? Kivlahan C, Ingram E. Acta Cytol; 1986; 30(3):258-60. PubMed ID: 3459326 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the endocervical Cytobrush and Cervex-Brush in pregnant women. Paraiso MF, Brady K, Helmchen R, Roat TW. Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Oct; 84(4):539-43. PubMed ID: 8090390 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Improved yield of endocervical cells on Papanicolaou smears in a residency setting. Kivlahan C, Ingram E. J Fam Pract; 1985 Apr; 20(4):381-5. PubMed ID: 3981098 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the yield of the standard Papanicolaou and endocervical brush smears. Hoffman MS, Hill DA, Gordy LW, Lane J, Cavanagh D. J Reprod Med; 1991 Apr; 36(4):267-9. PubMed ID: 1649306 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized trial of three methods of obtaining Papanicolaou smears. Pretorius RG, Sadeghi M, Fotheringham N, Semrad N, Watring WG. Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):831-6. PubMed ID: 1923208 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Antepartum and postpartum Papanicolaou smears. Are they both necessary? Jazayeri A, Heffron JA, Harnetty P, Jazayeri M, Gould SF. J Reprod Med; 1999 Oct; 44(10):879-82. PubMed ID: 10554750 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of two Papanicolaou smear techniques in a family practice setting. Reissman SE. J Fam Pract; 1988 May; 26(5):525-9. PubMed ID: 3367117 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy of cotton-tipped applicators for obtaining cells from the uterine cervix for Papanicolaou smears. Shen JT, Nalick RH, Schlaerth JB, Morrow CP. Acta Cytol; 1984 May; 28(5):541-5. PubMed ID: 6592916 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Controlled evaluation of implementing the Cytobrush technique to improve Papanicolaou smear quality. Murata PJ, Johnson RA, McNicoll KE. Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Apr; 75(4):690-5. PubMed ID: 2314788 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing two sampling techniques for endocervical cell recovery on Papanicolaou smears. Helderman G, Graham L, Cannon D, Waters K, Feller D. Nurse Pract; 1990 Nov; 15(11):30-2. PubMed ID: 2255424 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effectiveness and safety of two cervical cytologic techniques during pregnancy. Stillson T, Knight AL, Elswick RK. J Fam Pract; 1997 Aug; 45(2):159-63. PubMed ID: 9267375 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Papanicolaou smear adequacy: the effect of the sampling sequence. Noel ML, Kazal LA, Glenday MC. J Am Board Fam Pract; 1993 Aug; 6(2):103-7. PubMed ID: 8452061 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative yield of endocervical and metaplastic cells. Two sampling techniques: wooden spatula and cytology brush. Lo L, Jordan J. Can Fam Physician; 1995 Sep; 41():1497-502. PubMed ID: 8520238 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The efficiency of the Cytobrush versus the cotton swab in the collection of endocervical cells in cervical smears. Trimbos JB, Arentz NP. Acta Cytol; 1986 Sep; 30(3):261-3. PubMed ID: 3521175 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cytology after cryosurgery, laser ablation and conization. A comparison of the cotton swab and endocervical brush. Partoll LM, Javaheri G. Acta Cytol; 1993 Sep; 37(6):876-8. PubMed ID: 8249505 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The optimal technique for obtaining a Papanicolaou smear with the Cervex-Brush. Ferris DG, Berrey MM, Ellis KE, Petry LJ, Voxnaes J, Beatie RT. J Fam Pract; 1992 Mar; 34(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 1541953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of the size of extended, modified Ayre's spatula on endocervical cell yield in the postmenopausal women. Parnpoonsarp W, Ploarsa P, Arpakorn V. J Med Assoc Thai; 2009 Jun; 92 Suppl 3():S9-14. PubMed ID: 19702064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]