These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

225 related items for PubMed ID: 3974271

  • 1. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves.
    Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Gill CC, Golding LA, Stewart RW, Loop FD, Williams GW.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
    Bove EL, Marvasti MA, Potts JL, Reger MJ, Zamora JL, Eich RH, Parker FB.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in vivo.
    Cosgrove DM, Lytle BW, Williams GW.
    Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):II146-52. PubMed ID: 4028359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus.
    Wagner IM, Eichinger WB, Bleiziffer S, Botzenhardt F, Gebauer I, Guenzinger R, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 May; 133(5):1234-41. PubMed ID: 17467435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The complete supraannular concept: in vivo hemodynamics of bovine and porcine aortic bioprostheses.
    Ruzicka DJ, Hettich I, Hutter A, Bleiziffer S, Badiu CC, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R, Eichinger WB.
    Circulation; 2009 Sep 15; 120(11 Suppl):S139-45. PubMed ID: 19752359
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G, Tarzia V, Rizzoli G, Bottio T.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May 15; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of Carpentier-Edwards pericardial and supraannular bioprostheses in aortic valve replacement.
    Puvimanasinghe JP, Takkenberg JJ, Eijkemans MJ, van Herwerden LA, Jamieson WR, Grunkemeier GL, Habbema JD, Bogers AJ.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Mar 15; 29(3):374-9. PubMed ID: 16386920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: a stented valve with stentless performance?
    Totaro P, Degno N, Zaidi A, Youhana A, Argano V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Dec 15; 130(6):1668-74. PubMed ID: 16308014
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Differences in Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenograft aortic valve hemodynamics. Effect of valve size.
    Khan SS, Mitchell RS, Derby GC, Oyer PE, Miller DC.
    Circulation; 1990 Nov 15; 82(5 Suppl):IV117-24. PubMed ID: 2225396
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Hemodynamic evaluation of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses.
    Levine FH, Carter JE, Buckley MJ, Daggett WM, Akins CW, Austen WG.
    Circulation; 1981 Aug 15; 64(2 Pt 2):II192-5. PubMed ID: 7249322
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. In vitro hemodynamic characteristics of tissue bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Yoganathan AP, Woo YR, Sung HW, Williams FP, Franch RH, Jones M.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug 15; 92(2):198-209. PubMed ID: 3736078
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul 15; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM, Zhou JY, Hu SS, Cui JW, Song YH, Tang Y, Zhang Y, Jiang H, Yuan WM, Song XY.
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul 29; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Hemodynamic evaluation of the Carpentier-Edwards porcine bioprosthesis and the Hancock pericardial bioprosthesis in aortic position].
    Cohen-Solal A, Leroy G, Hittinger L, Fernandez F, Gay J, Gourgon R.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1986 Mar 29; 79(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 3087318
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Do pericardial bioprostheses improve outcome of elderly patients undergoing aortic valve replacement?
    Said SM, Ashikhmina E, Greason KL, Suri RM, Park SJ, Daly RC, Burkhart HM, Dearani JA, Sundt TM, Schaff HV.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2012 Jun 29; 93(6):1868-74; discussion 1874-5. PubMed ID: 22440366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hemodynamic performance of the new St. Jude Medical Epic Supra porcine bioprosthesis in comparison to the Medtronic Mosaic on the basis of patient annulus diameter.
    Ruzicka DJ, Eichinger WB, Hettich IM, Bleiziffer S, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2008 Jul 29; 17(4):426-33; discussion 434. PubMed ID: 18751473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Toronto root stentless valve in the subcoronary position is hemodynamically superior to the mosaic stented completely supra-annular bioprosthesis.
    Bleiziffer S, Eichinger WB, Wagner I, Guenzinger R, Bauernschmitt R, Lange R.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov 29; 14(6):814-21; discussion 821. PubMed ID: 16359064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hemodynamic performance of the Ultracor and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses using exercise and dobutamine stress echocardiography.
    Hobson NA, Wilkinson GA, Wheeldon NM, Lynch J.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Nov 29; 14(6):828-34. PubMed ID: 16359066
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hemodynamic comparison of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards mitral bioprosthetic valves.
    Khan S, Mitchell RS, Derby GC, Oyer PE, Miller DC.
    Circulation; 1990 Nov 29; 82(5 Suppl):IV75-81. PubMed ID: 2225438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Relation between size of prosthesis and valve gradient: comparison of two aortic bioprosthesis.
    Seitelberger R, Bialy J, Gottardi R, Seebacher G, Moidl R, Mittelböck M, Simon P, Wolner E.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar 29; 25(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 15019661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.