These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


163 related items for PubMed ID: 3993534

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Antihypertensive effects of beta-blockers administered once daily: 24-hour measurements.
    Neutel JM, Schnaper H, Cheung DG, Graettinger WF, Weber MA.
    Am Heart J; 1990 Jul; 120(1):166-71. PubMed ID: 2360502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Acebutolol in essential hypertension: results of two multicenter studies against placebo and propranolol.
    Davidov M.
    Am Heart J; 1985 May; 109(5 Pt 2):1158-67. PubMed ID: 2859780
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Comparison of once daily atenolol, nitrendipine and their combination in mild to moderate essential hypertension.
    Maclean D, Mitchell ET, Lewis R, Irvine N, McLay JS, McEwen J, Coulson RR, Slater ND, Fitzsimons TJ, McDevitt DG.
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1990 Apr; 29(4):455-63. PubMed ID: 2183868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of lacidipine with atenolol in the treatment of essential hypertension. The United Kingdom Lacidipine Study Group.
    J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 1991 Apr; 17 Suppl 4():S27-30. PubMed ID: 1726002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Acebutolol in mild to moderate hypertension: a double-blind crossover study.
    Hua AS, Kalowski S, Whitworth JA, Kincaid-Smith P.
    Med J Aust; 1980 Mar 08; 1(5):226-8. PubMed ID: 6990216
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. A double-blind comparison of metoprolol CR/ZOK 50 mg and atenolol 50 mg once daily for uncomplicated hypertension.
    Klein G, Berger J, Olsson G, Menzel T.
    J Clin Pharmacol; 1990 Feb 08; 30(S2):S72-7. PubMed ID: 2179284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Multicentre study of the efficacy and tolerance of acebutolol versus atenolol in the long term treatment of mild arterial hypertension.
    De Backer G.
    Drugs; 1988 Feb 08; 36 Suppl 2():51-6. PubMed ID: 3063506
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of a new vasodilating beta-blocker, carvedilol, with atenolol in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension.
    Ruilope LM.
    Am J Hypertens; 1994 Feb 08; 7(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 7910028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. A long-term double-blind comparison of doxazosin and atenolol in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.
    Frick MH, Halttunen P, Himanen P, Huttunen M, Pörsti P, Pitkäjärvi T, Pöyhönen L, Pyykönen ML, Reinikainen P, Salmela P.
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1986 Feb 08; 21 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):55S-62S. PubMed ID: 2939868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of once and twice daily atenolol in hypertension.
    Castleden CM, Dathan JR, George CF.
    Postgrad Med J; 1977 Nov 08; 53(625):679-82. PubMed ID: 339214
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A comparison of once daily atenolol and metoprolol SA in mild to moderate hypertension.
    Morley CA, Cavalcanti C, Perrins EJ, Sutton R.
    Br J Clin Pharmacol; 1983 Jun 08; 15(6):715-7. PubMed ID: 6347229
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.