These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

163 related items for PubMed ID: 3998641

  • 1. Comparative accuracy of computerized spatial vectorcardiography and standard electrocardiography for detection of myocardial infarction.
    Cowan MJ, Bruce RA, Van Winkle D, Davidson L, Killpack A.
    J Electrocardiol; 1985 Apr; 18(2):111-22. PubMed ID: 3998641
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Estimation of myocardial infarct size by digital computer analysis of the VCG.
    Cowan MJ, Reichenbach DD, Bruce RA, Fisher L.
    J Electrocardiol; 1982 Oct; 15(4):307-16. PubMed ID: 7142870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Identification of Patients with Myocardial Infarction. Vectorcardiographic and Electrocardiographic Analysis.
    Correa R, Arini PD, Correa LS, Valentinuzzi M, Laciar E.
    Methods Inf Med; 2016 May 17; 55(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 27063981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Computer analysis of vectorcardiograms in myocardial infarction with special reference to polar vector and planarity of the QRS and T loops.
    Yamauchi K.
    Jpn Heart J; 1979 Sep 17; 20(5):587-601. PubMed ID: 387998
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Visual transform applications for estimating the spatial QRS-T angle from the conventional 12-lead ECG: Kors is still most Frank.
    Cortez D, Sharma N, Devers C, Devers E, Schlegel TT.
    J Electrocardiol; 2014 Sep 17; 47(1):12-9. PubMed ID: 24099887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Posterobasal infarction and right bundle branch block: value of computerized vectorcardiography].
    Timpone G, Nicolai P, Lefevre J, Guerrini P, Delaage M.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1982 Jul 17; 75(7):775-84. PubMed ID: 6810806
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Polarcardiographic study of inferior myocardial infarction: global projection of heart vector.
    Sada T, Takeuchi M, Hayashi N, Su KM.
    J Electrocardiol; 1982 Jul 17; 15(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 7119635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Improved ECG interpretation using synthesized VCG for the diagnosis of inferior myocardial infarction.
    Edenbrandt L, Pahlm O, Lyttkens K, Albrechtsson U.
    J Electrocardiol; 1990 Jul 17; 23(3):207-11. PubMed ID: 2384726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Validation of a computerized QRS criterion for estimating myocardial infarction size and correlation with quantitative morphologic measurements.
    Cowan MJ, Bruce RA, Reichenbach DD.
    Am J Cardiol; 1986 Jan 01; 57(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 3942077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of electrocardiograms recorded with standard leads and derived from the vectorcardiographic frank leads in high risk patients.
    Gannedahl PE, Ljungqvist OH, Lundin P, Edner M.
    Intensive Care Med; 1997 Oct 01; 23(10):1049-55. PubMed ID: 9407240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Measurement of S-T segment elevation in acute myocardial infarction in man. Comparison of a precordial mapping technique and the Frank vector system.
    Akiyama T, Hodges M, Biddle TL, Zawrotny B, Vangellow C.
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 Aug 01; 36(2):155-62. PubMed ID: 1155336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The effect of respiration on normal and abnormal Q waves. An electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic analysis.
    Mimbs JW, deMello V, Roberts R.
    Am Heart J; 1977 Nov 01; 94(5):579-84. PubMed ID: 910696
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Vectorcardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of anterior myocardial infarction.
    Starr JW, Wagner GS, Draffin RM, Reed JB, Walston A, Behar VS.
    Circulation; 1976 Feb 01; 53(2):229-34. PubMed ID: 1245030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparative accuracy of electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic criteria for inferior myocardial infarction.
    Hurd HP, Starling MR, Crawford MH, Dlabal PW, O'Rourke RA.
    Circulation; 1981 May 01; 63(5):1025-9. PubMed ID: 7471360
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Electrocardiographic and vectorcardiographic diagnosis of posterior wall myocardial infarction. Significance of the T wave.
    Eisenstein I, Sanmarco ME, Madrid WL, Selvester RH.
    Chest; 1985 Sep 01; 88(3):409-16. PubMed ID: 4028851
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Electrocardiographic tall R waves in the right precordial leads. Comparison of recently proposed ECG and VCG criteria for distinguishing posterolateral myocardial infarction from prominent anterior forces in normal subjects.
    Zema MJ.
    J Electrocardiol; 1990 Apr 01; 23(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 2341816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. On-line computerized vectorcardiography monitoring of myocardial ischemia during coronary angioplasty: comparison with 12-lead electrocardiography.
    Jensen SM, Johansson G, Osterman G, Reiz S, Näslund U.
    Coron Artery Dis; 1994 Jun 01; 5(6):507-14. PubMed ID: 7952410
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. THE Q WAVE IN L III AND AVF OF THE ELECTROCARDIOGRAM. A VECTORCARDIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS WITH THE USE OF THE FRANK SYSTEM.
    BENCHIMOL A, ROBERTS MW, DIMOND EG.
    Calif Med; 1964 Mar 01; 100(3):168-74. PubMed ID: 14131398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Delineation of QRS offset by instantaneous changes in ECG vector angle can improve detection of acute inferior myocardial infarctions.
    Starc V, Schlegel TT.
    J Electrocardiol; 2016 Mar 01; 49(3):337-44. PubMed ID: 26979381
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. XYZ data interpreted by a 12-lead computer program using the derived electrocardiogram.
    Dower GE, Machado HB.
    J Electrocardiol; 1979 Jul 01; 12(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 89179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.