These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

72 related items for PubMed ID: 4017512

  • 1. Anaerobic identification systems.
    Rosenblatt JE.
    Clin Lab Med; 1985 Mar; 5(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 4017512
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Evaluation of Minitec and API as rapid diagnostic methods for anaerobic bacteria.
    Bergan T, Vangdal M, Salveson A.
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984 Mar; 91():103-11. PubMed ID: 6377470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of the AnIdent system for the identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Stenson MJ, Lee DT, Rosenblatt JE, Contezac JM.
    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1986 May; 5(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 3709098
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC, Kaufmann CS, Keifer JC, Venbrux HJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 6355150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Specimen collection and transport, anaerobic culture techniques, and identification of anaerobes.
    Citron DM.
    Rev Infect Dis; 1984 Sep; 6 Suppl 1():S51-8. PubMed ID: 6372037
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Experiences with the API 20A system in routine species identification of anaerobes (author's transl)].
    Essers L, Haralambie E.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A; 1977 Jul; 238(3):394-401. PubMed ID: 333828
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Karachewski NO, Busch EL, Wells CL.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of three identification systems for anaerobes.
    Murray PR, Weber CJ, Niles AC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 2862161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of API ZYM system with API AN-Ident, API 20A, Minitek Anaerobe II, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of Clostridium difficile.
    Head CB, Ratnam S.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Jan; 26(1):144-6. PubMed ID: 3277989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Comparison of API-10s and Minitek with conventional biochemical tests (author's transl)].
    Stanek G, Hirschl A, Rotter M.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Feb; 246(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 6999781
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Current issues and problems in dealing with anaerobes in the clinical laboratory.
    Allen SD, Siders JA, Marler LM.
    Clin Lab Med; 1995 Jun; 15(2):333-64. PubMed ID: 7671577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of the oxyrase OxyPlate anaerobe incubation system.
    Wiggs LS, Cavallaro JJ, Miller JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2000 Feb; 38(2):499-507. PubMed ID: 10655335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Izard D, Gavini F, Ochin D, Enayeh E, Leclerc H.
    Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of API and Minitek to Center for Disease Control methods for the biochemical characterization of anaerobes.
    Hansen SL, Stewart BJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1976 Sep; 4(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 787009
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.