These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 4018067

  • 1. Comparison of two systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Gulletta E, Amato G, Nani E, Covelli I.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jun; 4(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 4018067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparative evaluation of RapID ANA and API 20 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Summanen P, Jousimies-Somer H.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 1988 Dec; 7(6):771-5. PubMed ID: 3145860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of PRAS II, RapID ANA, and API 20A systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Karachewski NO, Busch EL, Wells CL.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jan; 21(1):122-6. PubMed ID: 3881468
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of the PRAS II, AN-Ident, and RapID-ANA systems for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Burlage RS, Ellner PD.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 3894412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Phenotypic identification of over 1000 isolates of anaerobic bacteria recovered between 1999 and 2008 in a major Costa Rican hospital.
    Rodríguez-Cavallini E, Vargas P, Rodríguez C, Quesada-Gómez C, Gamboa-Coronado MM.
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2011 Jul; 17(7):1043-7. PubMed ID: 21722256
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Preformed enzyme profiles of reference strains of gram-positive anaerobic cocci.
    Murdoch DA, Mitchelmore IJ, Nash RA, Hardie JM, Tabaqchali S.
    J Med Microbiol; 1988 Sep; 27(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 3172172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of BBL Crystal ANR ID Kit and API rapid ID 32 A for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Moll WM, Ungerechts J, Marklein G, Schaal KP.
    Zentralbl Bakteriol; 1996 Jul; 284(2-3):329-47. PubMed ID: 8837394
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Clinical evaluation of the Vitek ANI card for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Schreckenberger PC, Celig DM, Janda WM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1988 Feb; 26(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 3343321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Performances of VITEK 2 colorimetric cards for identification of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.
    Wallet F, Loïez C, Renaux E, Lemaitre N, Courcol RJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 2005 Sep; 43(9):4402-6. PubMed ID: 16145083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Utility of the L-alanine-aminopeptidase test for differentiating the cell wall structure of bacteria].
    Hernández Molina JM, Martínez A, Parra MC, Ortega MI.
    Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin; 1991 Dec; 9(10):637-9. PubMed ID: 1726575
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Microbiology terminology update: clinically significant anaerobic gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (excluding spirochetes).
    Jousimies-Somer H, Summanen P.
    Clin Infect Dis; 1997 Jul; 25(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 9243024
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Comparative evaluation of three identification systems for anaerobes.
    Murray PR, Weber CJ, Niles AC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jul; 22(1):52-5. PubMed ID: 2862161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The laboratory identification of gram-positive anaerobic cocci.
    Murdoch DA, Mitchelmore IJ.
    J Med Microbiol; 1991 May; 34(5):295-308. PubMed ID: 2030504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of the RapID ANA system as a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.
    Downes J, Andrew JH.
    Pathology; 1988 Jul; 20(3):256-9. PubMed ID: 3060822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Clinical evaluation of the RapID-ANA II panel for identification of anaerobic bacteria.
    Celig DM, Schreckenberger PC.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 Mar; 29(3):457-62. PubMed ID: 2037661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Comparative in vitro susceptibilities of 396 unusual anaerobic strains to tigecycline and eight other antimicrobial agents.
    Goldstein EJ, Citron DM, Merriam CV, Warren YA, Tyrrell KL, Fernandez HT.
    Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 2006 Oct; 50(10):3507-13. PubMed ID: 16940056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of three methods for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC, Kaufmann CS, Keifer JC, Venbrux HJ.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Sep; 18(3):614-21. PubMed ID: 6355150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of the new RapID-ANA II system for the identification of clinical anaerobic isolates.
    Marler LM, Siders JA, Wolters LC, Pettigrew Y, Skitt BL, Allen SD.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1991 May; 29(5):874-8. PubMed ID: 2056052
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.