These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 4018067

  • 21. [Recent taxonomic changes in anaerobes of clinical importance].
    Watanabe K.
    Rinsho Biseibutshu Jinsoku Shindan Kenkyukai Shi; 2005; 16(2):115-25. PubMed ID: 16536057
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Vitek 2 ANC card versus BBL Crystal Anaerobe and RapID ANA II for identification of clinical anaerobic bacteria.
    Blairon L, Maza ML, Wybo I, Piérard D, Dediste A, Vandenberg O.
    Anaerobe; 2010 Aug; 16(4):355-61. PubMed ID: 20685292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Rapid enzymatic characterization of clinically encountered anaerobic bacteria with the API ZYM system.
    Marler L, Allen S, Siders J.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Aug; 3(4):294-300. PubMed ID: 6386457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. [Specificity of the anaerobic bacterial infections in the surgical and orthopedic wards].
    Kierzkowska M, Majewska A, Sawicka-Grzelak A, Młynarczyk A, Ładomirska-Pestkowska K, Młynarczyk G.
    Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 2012 Aug; 64(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 22808727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. A Retrospective Analysis of Anaerobic Bacteria Isolated in 236 Cases of Pleural Empyema and their Prevalance of Antimicrobial Resistance in Turkey.
    Demirci M, Gemicioglu B, Saribas S, Taner Z, Mamal-Torun M, Karatoka B, Asik-Cagli L, Guven O, Demiryas S, Kocazeybek BS, Bahar-Tokman H.
    Clin Lab; 2018 Jul 01; 64(7):1269-1277. PubMed ID: 30146848
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Comparison of a commercial disk test with vancomycin and colimycin susceptibility testing for identification of bacteria with abnormal gram staining reactions.
    Fenollar F, Raoult D.
    Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis; 2000 Jan 01; 19(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 10706177
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Accuracies of Leuconostoc phenotypic identification: a comparison of API systems and conventional phenotypic assays.
    Kulwichit W, Nilgate S, Chatsuwan T, Krajiw S, Unhasuta C, Chongthaleong A.
    BMC Infect Dis; 2007 Jul 02; 7():69. PubMed ID: 17605772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. A comparison of Api 20A vs MALDI-TOF MS for routine identification of clinically significant anaerobic bacterial strains to the species level.
    Kierzkowska M, Majewska A, Kuthan RT, Sawicka-Grzelak A, Młynarczyk G.
    J Microbiol Methods; 2013 Feb 15; 92(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 23262031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. Usefulness of the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA bacterial identification system for identification of anaerobic Gram positive bacilli isolated from blood cultures.
    Lau SK, Ng KH, Woo PC, Yip KT, Fung AM, Woo GK, Chan KM, Que TL, Yuen KY.
    J Clin Pathol; 2006 Feb 15; 59(2):219-22. PubMed ID: 16443743
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Evaluation of the BBL Crystal Anaerobe identification system.
    Cavallaro JJ, Wiggs LS, Miller JM.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1997 Dec 15; 35(12):3186-91. PubMed ID: 9399517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Identification and susceptibility testing for obligate anaerobic bacteria using a semi-automated API ATB plus system.
    Grollier G, Burucoa C, Bonnin M, de Rautlin de La Roy Y.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1992 Dec 15; 50(6-7):393-7. PubMed ID: 1492717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Accuracy and reproducibility of a four-hour method for anaerobe identification.
    Appelbaum PC, Kaufmann CS, Depenbusch JW.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Jun 15; 21(6):894-8. PubMed ID: 4008619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Comparison of American MicroScan dry and frozen microdilution trays.
    Schieven BC, Hussain Z, Lannigan R.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct 15; 22(4):495-6. PubMed ID: 3935659
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. The optimization and validation of the Biotyper MALDI-TOF MS database for the identification of Gram-positive anaerobic cocci.
    Veloo AC, de Vries ED, Jean-Pierre H, Justesen US, Morris T, Urban E, Wybo I, van Winkelhoff AJ, ENRIA workgroup.
    Clin Microbiol Infect; 2016 Sep 15; 22(9):793-798. PubMed ID: 27404365
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Evaluation of Minitec and API as rapid diagnostic methods for anaerobic bacteria.
    Bergan T, Vangdal M, Salveson A.
    Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl; 1984 Sep 15; 91():103-11. PubMed ID: 6377470
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Microbiology terminology update: clinically significant anaerobic gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria (excluding spirochetes).
    Jousimies-Somer H, Summanen P.
    Clin Infect Dis; 1999 Oct 15; 29(4):724-7. PubMed ID: 10589876
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Evaluation of the RapID-ANA system for identification of anaerobic bacteria of veterinary origin.
    Adney WS, Jones RL.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Dec 15; 22(6):980-3. PubMed ID: 3905854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.