These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

224 related items for PubMed ID: 4031260

  • 1. Prior stimulation and the masking-level difference.
    Yost WA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Sep; 78(3):901-7. PubMed ID: 4031260
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effects of temporal separation and masker level on binaural analysis in forward masking.
    Yama MF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):327-35. PubMed ID: 1737881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A, Kohlrausch A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The phase angle of addition in temporal masking for diotic and dichotic listening conditions.
    Yost WA, Grantham DW, Lutfi RA, Stern RM.
    Hear Res; 1982 Aug; 7(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 7118730
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Masker fringe and binaural detection.
    Gilkey RH, Simpson BD, Weisenberger JM.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1323-31. PubMed ID: 2229667
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The role of across-frequency processes in dichotic listening conditions.
    Nitschmann M, Verhey JL, Kollmeier B.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3188-98. PubMed ID: 20000932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Binaural signal detection, overall masking level, and masker interaural correlation: revisiting the internal noise hypothesis.
    Bernstein LR, Trahiotis C.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3850-60. PubMed ID: 19206811
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. The effect of diotic and dichotic level-randomization on the binaural masking-level difference.
    Henning GB, Richards VM, Lentz JJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2005 Nov; 118(5):3229-40. PubMed ID: 16334902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Frequency resolution for diotic and dichotic listening conditions compared using the bandlimiting measure and a modified bandlimiting measure.
    Cokely JA, Hall JW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Mar; 89(3):1331-9. PubMed ID: 2030220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Masking of rippled-spectrum-pattern resolution in diotic and dichotic presentations.
    Supin AY, Popov VV, Milekhina ON, Tarakanov MB.
    Hear Res; 2010 Feb; 260(1-2):109-16. PubMed ID: 20005938
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Reducing informational masking by sound segregation.
    Kidd G, Mason CR, Deliwala PS, Woods WS, Colburn HS.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jun; 95(6):3475-80. PubMed ID: 8046139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Signal detectability in the presence of monotic or dichotic noise bands of equal or unequal levels.
    Stillman JA, Irwin RJ.
    Percept Psychophys; 1990 Mar; 47(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 2326150
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Differences between psychophysical "suppression effects" under diotic and dichotic listening conditions.
    Yama MF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Nov; 72(5):1380-3. PubMed ID: 7175022
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Off-frequency BMLD: the role of monaural processing.
    van de Par S, Luebken B, Verhey JL, Kohlrausch A.
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013 Nov; 787():293-301. PubMed ID: 23716235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Masking effects in binaural detection and interaural time discrimination.
    Koehnke J, Cohen MF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Mar; 81(3):724-9. PubMed ID: 3584680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Improving the detectability of a brief tone in noise using forward and backward masker fringes: monotic and dichotic presentations.
    Kidd G, Wright BA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):962-7. PubMed ID: 8132910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The role of off-frequency masking in binaural hearing.
    Buss E, Hall JW.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jun; 127(6):3666-77. PubMed ID: 20550265
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. NoSo and NoS pi detection as a function of masker bandwidth in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Staffel JG, Hall JW, Grose JH, Pillsbury HC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Apr; 87(4):1720-7. PubMed ID: 2341676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.