These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


113 related items for PubMed ID: 4044755

  • 1. Influence of the biological matrix on retention behaviour in thin-layer chromatography: evidence of systematic differences between pure and extracted drugs.
    Bogusz M, Gierz J, de Zeeuw RA, Franke JP.
    J Chromatogr; 1985 Jul 12; 342(1):241-4. PubMed ID: 4044755
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Influence of biological matrix on retention behaviour and identification possibilities of selected neutral and acidic drugs in thin layer chromatography. An interlaboratory investigation.
    Bogusz M, Franke JP, Wijsbeek J, de Zeeuw RA.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1986 Jul 12; 10(6):245-9. PubMed ID: 3807324
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Impact of biological matrix, drug concentration, and method of isolation on detectability and variability of retention index values in gas chromatography.
    Bogusz M, Wijsbeek J, Franke JP, de Zeeuw RA, Gierz J.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1985 Jul 12; 9(2):49-54. PubMed ID: 3990247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer as a new and important tool in forensic toxicology.
    Skinner RF, Gallaher EJ, Knight JB, Bonelli EJ.
    J Forensic Sci; 1972 Apr 12; 17(2):189-98. PubMed ID: 4679764
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Application of amberlite XAD-2 resin for general toxicological analysis.
    Ibrahim G, Andryauskas S, Bastos ML.
    J Chromatogr; 1975 May 07; 108(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 1150810
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Impact of biological matrix and isolation methods on detectability and interlaboratory variations of TLC Rf-values in systematic toxicological analysis.
    Bogusz M, Klys M, Wijsbeek J, Franke JP, de Zeeuw RA.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1984 May 07; 8(4):149-54. PubMed ID: 6471812
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Erratic data in thin layer chromatography due to anomalous behavior of correction standards.
    Bogusz M, Bialka J, de Zeeuw RA, Franke JP.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1985 May 07; 9(3):139-40. PubMed ID: 4010238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Determination of unknown drugs in "fresh" autopsy material. II. Interference from biogenic compounds.
    Kaempe B.
    Dan Tidsskr Farm; 1971 May 07; 45(4):86-106. PubMed ID: 5558210
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Improved detection and identification of basic drugs extracted from tissue using TLC.
    Galante L, Bonventre J, Salvione H, Bastos ML.
    J Anal Toxicol; 1982 May 07; 6(5):262-3. PubMed ID: 7176561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Our experiences with the demonstration of various toxicologically significant drugs with thin layer chromatography].
    König J, Chundela B, Sulcová M.
    Bratisl Lek Listy; 1967 May 07; 48(11):655-8. PubMed ID: 5584029
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Applications of thin-layer chromatography in pharmaceutical analyses.
    Comer JP, Comer I.
    J Pharm Sci; 1967 Apr 07; 56(4):413-36. PubMed ID: 5340574
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Use of IR spectroscopy in combination with thin-layer chromatography for identifying drugs].
    Georgievskiĭ VP, Bublik NP.
    Farm Zh; 1974 Apr 07; 29(5):46-9. PubMed ID: 4463085
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.