These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

161 related items for PubMed ID: 4046585

  • 1. Diotic loudness summation in normal and impaired hearing.
    Hall JW, Harvey AD.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):445-8. PubMed ID: 4046585
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Measurement and modeling of binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC, Gibbs A, Onions G, Glasberg BR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):736-47. PubMed ID: 25096108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A, Kohlrausch A.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Binaural loudness summation in the hearing impaired.
    Hawkins DB, Prosek RA, Walden BE, Montgomery AA.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Mar; 30(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 3560897
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Binaural loudness gain measured by simple reaction time.
    Schlittenlacher J, Ellermeier W, Arseneau J.
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jul; 76(5):1465-72. PubMed ID: 24806401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Binaural versus monaural loudness: supersummation of tone partially masked by noise.
    Marks LE.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Jan; 81(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 3819169
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Influence of suppression on restoration of spectral loudness summation in listeners with hearing loss.
    Rasetshwane DM, High RR, Kopun JG, Neely ST, Gorga MP, Jesteadt W.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 May; 143(5):2994. PubMed ID: 29857738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Preferred overall loudness. II: Listening through hearing aids in field and laboratory tests.
    Smeds K, Keidser G, Zakis J, Dillon H, Leijon A, Grant F, Convery E, Brew C.
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jan; 45(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 16562560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Dichotic, diotic, and monaural summation of loudness: a comprehensive analysis of composition and psychophysical functions.
    Algom D, Ben-Aharon B, Cohen-Raz L.
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Dec; 46(6):567-78. PubMed ID: 2587186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Directional loudness in an anechoic sound field, head-related transfer functions, and binaural summation.
    Sivonen VP, Ellermeier W.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 May; 119(5 Pt 1):2965-80. PubMed ID: 16708953
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.