These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


226 related items for PubMed ID: 4058830

  • 1. Longitudinal analysis of a multisite clerkship.
    Strand DA, Vontver LA, Stenchever MA, Hadac RR, Irby DM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):723-6. PubMed ID: 4058830
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Profile of student clerkship administration in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Herbert WN, Cummings RV, Droegemueller W.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jul; 76(1):153-5. PubMed ID: 2359562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Evaluation of student performance in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.
    Miller JM, Smith IK, Sosnowski JR, Hester LL.
    J Reprod Med; 1982 Aug; 27(8):443-6. PubMed ID: 7131433
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Student evaluation in obstetrics and gynecology clerkships in the United States and Canada, 1985.
    Beckmann CR, Barzansky BM, Eden RD, Ling FW, Waxman B.
    J Reprod Med; 1989 May; 34(5):349-52. PubMed ID: 2732982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Medical student evaluation of teaching quality between obstetrics and gynecology residents and faculty as clinical preceptors in ambulatory gynecology.
    Johnson NR, Chen J.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Nov; 195(5):1479-83. PubMed ID: 16875655
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Medical students' evaluation in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Fantl JA, Papp KK, Dunn LJ.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Sep; 64(3):440-2. PubMed ID: 6462577
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intersecting gender, evaluations, and examinations: Averting gender bias in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship in the United States.
    Jacques L, Kaljo K, Treat R, Davis J, Farez R, Lund M.
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2016 Sep; 29(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 26996795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Variation in medical student grading criteria: a survey of clerkships in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Zahn CM, Nalesnik SW, Armstrong AY, Satin AJ, Haffner WH.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 190(5):1388-93. PubMed ID: 15167846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluating medical student obstetrics and gynecology clerkship performance: which assessment tools are most reliable?
    Nahum GG.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1762-71. PubMed ID: 15547561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Quantifying clinical activity in a multi-site clerkship in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Bornsztein B, Julian TM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Nov; 78(5 Pt 1):869-72. PubMed ID: 1923213
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The obstetrics and gynecology clerkship: building a better model from past experience.
    Burke WM, Williams JA, Fenner DE, Hammoud MM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Nov; 191(5):1772-6. PubMed ID: 15547562
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Incorporating problem-based learning into an obstetrics/gynecology clerkship: impact on student satisfaction and grades.
    Nalesnik SW, Heaton JO, Olsen CH, Haffner WH, Zahn CM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 190(5):1375-81. PubMed ID: 15167844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Evaluation of student performance in a multi-site clinical clerkship.
    Irby DM, Vontver LA, Stenchever MA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Apr 15; 136(8):1020-3. PubMed ID: 7369253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Increasing recruitment of quality students to obstetrics and gynecology: impact of a structured clerkship.
    Dunn TS, Wolf D, Beuler J, Coddington CC.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Feb 15; 103(2):339-41. PubMed ID: 14754705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Beyond the Ivory Tower: A Comparison of Grades Across Academic and Community OB/GYN Clerkship Sites.
    Fay EE, Schiff MA, Mendiratta V, Benedetti TJ, Debiec K.
    Teach Learn Med; 2016 Feb 15; 28(2):146-51. PubMed ID: 27064717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Oral examinations: actual and perceived contributions to surgery clerkship performance.
    Zelenock GB, Calhoun JG, Hockman EM, Youmans LC, Erlandson EE, Davis WK, Turcotte JG.
    Surgery; 1985 Jun 15; 97(6):737-44. PubMed ID: 4002121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Pelvic and breast examination skills curricula in United States medical schools: a survey of obstetrics and gynecology clerkship directors.
    Dugoff L, Pradhan A, Casey P, Dalrymple JL, Abbott JF, Buery-Joyner SD, Chuang A, Cullimore AJ, Forstein DA, Hampton BS, Kaczmarczyk JM, Katz NT, Nuthalapaty FS, Page-Ramsey SM, Wolf A, Hueppchen NA.
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Dec 16; 16(1):314. PubMed ID: 27986086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. An evaluation of trends in obstetrics and gynecology clerkships in the United States and Canada.
    Goepfert AR, Phelan SP, Cliver SP, Herbert WN.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul 16; 191(1):354-8. PubMed ID: 15295392
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Limitations of physician ratings in the assessment of student clinical performance in an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship.
    Metheny WP.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1991 Jul 16; 78(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 2047054
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Student evaluation in obstetrics and gynecology: self- versus departmental assessment.
    Herbert WN, McGaghie WC, Droegemueller W, Riddle MH, Maxwell KL.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Sep 16; 76(3 Pt 1):458-61. PubMed ID: 2381623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.