These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

107 related items for PubMed ID: 4059846

  • 1. The 40-Hz event-related potential as a measure of auditory sensitivity in normals.
    Sammeth CA, Barry SJ.
    Scand Audiol; 1985; 14(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 4059846
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Threshold prediction from the auditory 40-Hz evoked potential.
    Lynn JM, Lesner SA, Sandridge SA, Daddario CC.
    Ear Hear; 1984; 5(6):366-70. PubMed ID: 6510584
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory brainstem responses to single-slope stimuli. The influence of steepness and polarity.
    Gerull G, Mrowinski D, Janssen T, Anft D.
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(4):227-35. PubMed ID: 3438705
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Electrophysiologic assessment of low-frequency hearing: sedation effects.
    Palaskas CW, Wilson MJ, Dobie RA.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1989 Oct; 101(4):434-41. PubMed ID: 2508020
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The effect of change of stimulus frequency on the prediction of audiograms.
    Jerger J, Hayes D.
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 1982 Oct; 388():729-30. PubMed ID: 6953909
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Auditory brain stem responses from human infants: pure-tone masking profiles for clicks and filtered clicks.
    Folsom RC.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):555-62. PubMed ID: 4031254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Age and features of cortical auditory evoked potentials].
    Novikova LA, Rybalko NV.
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1982 Aug; 32(6):1132-9. PubMed ID: 7164578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparing auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) to toneburst and narrow band CE-chirp in young infants.
    Rodrigues GR, Ramos N, Lewis DR.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1555-60. PubMed ID: 23915488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The effect of sleep on the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and the middle latency response (MLR).
    Osterhammel PA, Shallop JK, Terkildsen K.
    Scand Audiol; 1985 Sep; 14(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 4059844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. 40-Hz steady-state responses in newborns and in children.
    Maurizi M, Almadori G, Paludetti G, Ottaviani F, Rosignoli M, Luciano R.
    Audiology; 1990 Sep; 29(6):322-8. PubMed ID: 2275647
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Short-latency auditory responses obtained by cross correlation.
    Dobie RA, Wilson MJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Nov; 76(5):1411-21. PubMed ID: 6512103
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Highpass filtering of auditory evoked brain stem potentials (author's transl)].
    Kiessling J, Althaus V.
    Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1981 Nov; 230(2):149-59. PubMed ID: 7295174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Frequency-specific auditory brainstem responses to clicks masked by notched noise.
    van Zanten GA, Brocaar MP.
    Audiology; 1984 Nov; 23(3):253-64. PubMed ID: 6732630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. ON and OFF components of the auditory brainstem response have different frequency- and intensity-specific properties.
    Henry KR.
    Hear Res; 1985 Jun; 18(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 4044424
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Frequency-dependent fine structure in the frequency-following response: The byproduct of multiple generators.
    Tichko P, Skoe E.
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():1-15. PubMed ID: 28137699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Stimulus dependencies of the gerbil brain-stem auditory-evoked response (BAER). III: Additivity of click level and rate with noise level.
    Burkard R, Voigt HF.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Nov; 88(5):2222-34. PubMed ID: 2269738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Compound action potentials recorded from the intracranial portion of the auditory nerve in man: effects of stimulus intensity and polarity.
    Møller AR, Jho HD.
    Audiology; 1991 Nov; 30(3):142-63. PubMed ID: 1953444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The frequency-following response to continuous tones in humans.
    Batra R, Kuwada S, Maher VL.
    Hear Res; 1986 Nov; 21(2):167-77. PubMed ID: 3700255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Tonotopic organization of human auditory cortex revealed by multi-channel SQUID system.
    Yamamoto T, Uemura T, Llinás R.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1992 Nov; 112(2):201-4. PubMed ID: 1604979
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Human auditory steady state potentials.
    Stapells DR, Linden D, Suffield JB, Hamel G, Picton TW.
    Ear Hear; 1984 Nov; 5(2):105-13. PubMed ID: 6724170
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.