These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

235 related items for PubMed ID: 4066245

  • 1. Effects of intravenous administration of a new nonionic dimeric contrast medium on the coronary circulation. Comparison with monomeric ionic and nonionic media.
    Lanzer P, Dean PB, Lipton MJ, Sievers R, Botvinick E, Higgins CB.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Oct; 20(7):746-50. PubMed ID: 4066245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Hemodynamic effects of contrast media during coronary angiography: a comparison of three nonionic agents to Hypaque-76.
    Piao ZE, Murdock DK, Hwang MH, Raymond RM, Scanlon PJ.
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1988 Oct; 14(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 3349517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB, Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Shaw D.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Oct; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of an ionic with a nonionic contrast agent for cardiac angiography. Results of a multicenter trial.
    Bettmann MA, Higgins CB.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Oct; 20(1 Suppl):S70-4. PubMed ID: 3882619
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Temporomandibular joint arthrography: comparison of morbidity with ionic and low osmolality contrast media.
    Katzberg RW, Miller TL, Hayakawa K, Manzione JV, Tallents RH.
    Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):245-6. PubMed ID: 3883421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Cardiotolerance of iohexol. Survey of experimental evidence.
    Higgins CB.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Apr; 20(1 Suppl):S65-9. PubMed ID: 3882618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Adult peripheral angiography. Results from four North American randomized clinical trials of ionic media versus iohexol.
    Wolf GL.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Apr; 366():166-70. PubMed ID: 6382932
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Acute cardiac side effects of iodecol, a new nonionic dimer roentgen contrast medium, in intracoronary injection].
    Schräder R, Hoeft A, Hoeft T, Korb H, Wolpers HG, Kober G, Hellige G.
    Z Kardiol; 1985 Oct; 74(10):604-10. PubMed ID: 4072332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF, Bergsjordet B, Seeger JF, Kieffer SA.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Oct; 366():81-4. PubMed ID: 6382939
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Contrast agents for cardiac angiography: effects of a nonionic agent vs. a standard ionic agent.
    Bettmann MA, Bourdillon PD, Barry WH, Brush KA, Levin DC.
    Radiology; 1984 Dec; 153(3):583-7. PubMed ID: 6387783
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Coronary arteriography with a plasma-isotonic roentgen contrast medium: effects on ECG, blood pressure and coronary circulation].
    Schräder R, Abel J, Sievert H, Friedmann A, Kaltenbach M, Kober G.
    Z Kardiol; 1989 Jan; 78(1):33-40. PubMed ID: 2646839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.