These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. [One-year longitudinal change in parameters of myopic school children trained by a new accommodative training device--uncorrected visual acuity, refraction, axial length, accommodation, and pupil reaction]. Watanabe K, Hara N, Kimijima M, Kotegawa Y, Ohno K, Arimoto A, Mukuno K, Hisahara S, Horie H. Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 2012 Oct; 116(10):929-36. PubMed ID: 23285840 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Longitudinal changes in objective accommodative response, pupil size and spherical aberration: A case study. Plainis S, Panagopoulou S, Charman WN. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2024 Jan; 44(1):168-176. PubMed ID: 37966110 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Accommodation stimulus-response function and retinal image quality. Buehren T, Collins MJ. Vision Res; 2006 May; 46(10):1633-45. PubMed ID: 16040078 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The depth-of-focus of the human eye for Snellen letters. Tucker J, Charman WN. Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1975 Jan; 52(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 1111286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Accommodation and convergence: effects of lenses and prisms in 'closed-loop' conditions. Ramsdale C, Charman WN. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1988 Jan; 8(1):43-52. PubMed ID: 3419828 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Interaction of aberrations, diffraction, and quantal fluctuations determine the impact of pupil size on visual quality. Xu R, Wang H, Thibos LN, Bradley A. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2017 Apr 01; 34(4):481-492. PubMed ID: 28375317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Predicted accommodative response from image quality in young eyes fitted with different dual-focus designs. Faria-Ribeiro M, Amorim-de-Sousa A, González-Méijome JM. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May 01; 38(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 29383756 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Pupil size, mean accommodation response and the fluctuations of accommodation. Stark LR, Atchison DA. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1997 Jul 01; 17(4):316-23. PubMed ID: 9390376 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Absence of pupil response to blur-driven accommodation. Phillips NJ, Winn B, Gilmartin B. Vision Res; 1992 Sep 01; 32(9):1775-9. PubMed ID: 1455749 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of optical vergence, contrast, and luminance on the accommodative response to spatially bandpass filtered targets. Kotulak JC, Schor CM. Vision Res; 1987 Sep 01; 27(10):1797-806. PubMed ID: 3445469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Accommodation and pupil behaviour of binocularly viewing early presbyopes. Almutairi MS, Altoaimi BH, Bradley A. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 Mar 01; 37(2):128-140. PubMed ID: 28211182 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of pupil and observation distance on the contrast sensitivity function. Hernández C, Doménech B, Seguí MM, Illueca C. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Jul 01; 16(4):336-41. PubMed ID: 8796203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Visual sensitivity to temporal change in focus and its relevance to the accommodation response. Walsh G, Charman WN. Vision Res; 1988 Jul 01; 28(11):1207-21. PubMed ID: 3253992 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]