These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 4088668

  • 1. Satisfying the presbyopic contact-lens wearer.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1985; 5(4):355-6. PubMed ID: 4088668
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Satisfying the presbyopic contact lens wearer.
    Rosenthal S.
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(3):353-4. PubMed ID: 3822480
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The management of presbyopia with contact lenses: a review.
    Stein HA.
    CLAO J; 1990; 16(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 2407378
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Traditional methods for the treatment of presbyopia: spectacles, contact lenses, bifocal contact lenses.
    Callina T, Reynolds TP.
    Ophthalmol Clin North Am; 2006 Mar; 19(1):25-33, v. PubMed ID: 16500526
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Bifocal contact lenses.
    Borish IM, Soni S.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1982 Mar; 53(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 7077040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Fused bifocal contact lenses.
    Morrison RJ.
    Br J Physiol Opt; 1970 Mar; 25(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 5512794
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS, Bennett ES, Lakshminarayanan V.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Contact lens wearer profile 2004.
    Bowden T, Harknett T.
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2005 Mar; 28(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 16318833
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fitting special types of patients.
    Cochet P, Amiard H.
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1969 Mar; 9(2):389-440. PubMed ID: 5386727
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fitting special types of patients.
    Cochet P, Amiard H.
    Int Ophthalmol Clin; 1969 Mar; 9(2):441-96. PubMed ID: 5386728
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
    Bachman WG.
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Introduction to the Proceedings of the 10th International Congress of Wavefront and Presbyopic Refractive Corrections (Lens, Refractive & Wavefront Summit ARI/WFC 2009).
    Krueger RR, Applegate RA.
    J Refract Surg; 2010 Jan; 26(1):43-4. PubMed ID: 20199011
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Stereopsis in anisometropically fit presbyopic contact lens wearers.
    Kastl PR.
    CLAO J; 1983 Jan; 9(4):322-3. PubMed ID: 6640883
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Nonpupil adaptive optics for visual simulation of a customized contact lens.
    Coughlan MF, Goncharov AV.
    Appl Opt; 2018 Aug 01; 57(22):E57-E63. PubMed ID: 30117922
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Bifocal contact lenses.
    Josephson JE.
    Optom Vis Sci; 1990 Mar 01; 67(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 2360944
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K, Mitchell GL, Zadnik K.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May 01; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.