These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

552 related items for PubMed ID: 4093245

  • 1. The use of iohexol in pediatric urography: a comparative study with meglumine diatrizoate.
    Bani E, Federighi F, Ghio R, Marchitiello M, Galigani P, Palla R.
    Int J Pediatr Nephrol; 1985; 6(4):271-4. PubMed ID: 4093245
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Urography with non-ionic contrast media: I. Diagnostic quality and tolerance of iohexol in comparison with meglumine amidotrizoate.
    Taenzer V, Heep H, Clauss W.
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1983; 118():148-52. PubMed ID: 6139070
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Digital subtraction angiography. Comparison of meglumine-Na diatrizoate with iohexol.
    Sackett JF, Bergsjordet B, Seeger JF, Cacayorin ED.
    Invest Radiol; 1985; 20(1 Suppl):S58-61. PubMed ID: 2579044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Iohexol for excretory urography: a comparative study.
    Winfield AC, Dray RJ, Kirchner FK, Muhletaler CA, Price RR.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Sep; 141(3):571-3. PubMed ID: 6349311
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Iohexol compared with diatrizoate in pediatric urography.
    Jorulf H.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Sep; 366():42-5. PubMed ID: 6591740
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Comparison of iohexol with meglumine-Na diatrizoate for intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Seeger JF, Carmody RF, Smith JR, Horsley WW, Criss E.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Sep; 366():85-8. PubMed ID: 6382940
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Iohexol in excretory urography. Results of drug monitoring].
    Schrott KM, Behrends B, Clauss W, Kaufmann J, Lehnert J.
    Fortschr Med; 1986 Feb 20; 104(7):153-6. PubMed ID: 3516817
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate in cerebral angiography.
    Kido DK, Morris TW, Ekholm S, Plassche W, Erickson JL.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Feb 20; 366():142-6. PubMed ID: 6591738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Cardioangiography in man using iohexol and meglumine-Na diatrizoate. A comparison of hemodynamic and electrocardiographic effects.
    Higgins CB, Mancini GB, Bloomquist JN, Shaw D.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Feb 20; 366():111-4. PubMed ID: 6591736
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Iohexol vs. diatrizoate. A comparative study in intravenous urography.
    Rankin RN, Eng FW.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Feb 20; 20(1 Suppl):S112-4. PubMed ID: 3972525
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The effects of contrast media on renal function in children: comparison of ionic and non-ionic agents.
    Buyan N, Arab M, Hasanoğlu E, Gökçora N, Ercan S.
    Turk J Pediatr; 1995 Feb 20; 37(4):305-13. PubMed ID: 8560597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Use of ioxaglate in abdominal angiography].
    Kumazaki T, Sugawara K, Hosoi S, Honda K, Asahi R, Suzuki T, Kanazawa M.
    Rinsho Hoshasen; 1983 Mar 20; 28(3):355-8. PubMed ID: 6876458
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Comparative study on nephrotoxicity of ionic and non-ionic contrast agents for drip infused urography].
    Sugaya K, Nishizawa O, Noto H, Suzuki T, Shimoda N, Miyagata S, Harada T, Tsuchida S.
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1992 Jul 20; 38(7):767-73. PubMed ID: 1524001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Iohexol for urography in children. A preliminary report.
    Stake G, Monn E, Sommerfeldt SC.
    Ann Radiol (Paris); 1982 Feb 20; 25(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 7073207
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Iohexol and ioxithalamate for intravenous urography. A comparative parallel study.
    Egeblad M, Nielsen NT, Fries J, Laulund S.
    Eur J Radiol; 1985 Aug 20; 5(3):240-2. PubMed ID: 3896801
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. High- and low-osmolar contrast agents in urography: a comparison of the appearances with respect to pyelotubular opacification and renal length.
    Whitehouse RW.
    Clin Radiol; 1986 Jul 20; 37(4):395-8. PubMed ID: 3731706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of pain and heat sensation of contrast media in aortofemoral angiography: meglumine-amidotrizoate (Angiografin) mixed with lidocaine versus sodium-meglumine-ioxaglate (Hexabrix).
    Heystraten FM, van den Berg FG, Mulderije ED.
    Diagn Imaging; 1983 Jul 20; 52(2-3):141-4. PubMed ID: 6851813
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Incidence of fibrillation with isotonic contrast media for intra-arterial coronary digital subtraction angiography.
    Morris TW, Hayakawa K, Sahler LG, Ekholm S.
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986 Jul 20; 55(3):109-13. PubMed ID: 3522039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Iohexol in urography. Survey and present state.
    Ekelund L.
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1983 Jul 20; 366():25-9. PubMed ID: 6206689
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparative radiological studies of Uromiro and Urografin as contrast media for excretion urography.
    Adamali N, Raja R.
    East Afr Med J; 1979 Nov 20; 56(11):593-6. PubMed ID: 520238
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 28.