These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


232 related items for PubMed ID: 4134347

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
    Timonen S, Nieminen U, Kauraniemi T.
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Significance of physical findings in diagnosis of cervical carcinoma.
    Moller KA, Fogh H, Moller PE, Strandbygard K.
    Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun; 19(4):122-7. PubMed ID: 5041568
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Exfoliative cytology in screening for cervical cancer--a critique.
    Mitchell JW.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1971 Oct 23; 105(8):833 passim. PubMed ID: 5162407
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Incidence of adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix in mass cytological and colposcopic diagnostic studies].
    Pieroni G, Cariaggi P, Ottaviano M, Marchionni M, Mincione G, Bartoloni St Omer F.
    Minerva Ginecol; 1975 May 23; 27(5):418-21. PubMed ID: 1134695
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
    Grönroos M, Tyrkkö J, Järvi O, Rauramo L.
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974 May 23; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Results of the Leiden mass screening for cervix uteri carcinoma; the 'young' (24-34 years) versus the 'old' (35-54 years) group of women].
    Boon ME, de Graaff Guilloud-Gentenaar JC, Beck S.
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1990 Aug 11; 134(32):1545-9. PubMed ID: 2392176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Diagnosis of vaginal carcinoma from cytologic material.
    Merchant S, Murad TM, Dowling EA, Durant J.
    Acta Cytol; 1974 Aug 11; 18(6):494-503. PubMed ID: 4531803
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Cytological diagnosis of cervical cancer in the early stages and its effect on morbidity and mortality].
    Möbius G.
    Cesk Patol; 1979 Feb 11; 15(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 436166
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The mode ages of women with cervical dysplasia.
    Carson HJ, DeMay RM.
    Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Sep 11; 82(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 8355947
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Cervical cytology in Greenland and occurrence of cervical carcinoma, carcinoma in situ, and dysplasia. Extent and impact of uncoordinated screening activity 1976-1985.
    Højgaard Nielsen N, Jensen H, Hansen PK.
    Arctic Med Res; 1988 Oct 11; 47(4):179-88. PubMed ID: 3214508
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. A clinicopathologic study of 44 cases.
    Czernobilsky B, Rotenstreich L, Lancet M.
    Isr J Med Sci; 1972 Dec 11; 8(12):1944-52. PubMed ID: 4655310
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.