These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 4135967

  • 1. Comparison of methods to detect significant bacteriuria.
    Callicott JH, Hoke HF, Dalton HP.
    Va Med Mon (1918); 1970 Oct; 97(10):653-6. PubMed ID: 4135967
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. [Bacteriological screening of urine. A comparative study of some new screening methods for detection of significant bacteriuria].
    Vejlşgaard R, Justesen T.
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1972 Sep 18; 134(38):1991-5. PubMed ID: 4561765
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. A comparison of screening methods for the detection of significant bacteriuria.
    Ingram GB, Wade WG.
    J Ir Med Assoc; 1966 Oct 18; 59(352):118-20. PubMed ID: 5342003
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Detection of bacteriuria--a comparison of tow methods.
    Mohankumar T, Chitkara YK, Joseph PS.
    Indian J Pathol Bacteriol; 1970 Jul 18; 13(3):114-8. PubMed ID: 4941853
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Experiences with the slide culture used as a preliminary study in bacteriological urine diagnostics].
    Tauchnitz C, Blatz R.
    Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1972 Mar 01; 27(5):197-202. PubMed ID: 4558911
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Experiences with uricult, a new method for the quantitative determination of bacteria in urine].
    Breitfellner G.
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1970 Apr 04; 120(14):235-43. PubMed ID: 4933975
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Comparative study and clinical significance of some methods for the detection of significant bacteriuria].
    Varga M, Dóbiás G, Faragó G.
    Orv Hetil; 1967 Jan 15; 108(3):97-100. PubMed ID: 4880167
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. [Bacteriologic urine examination in children with a simplified culture technic].
    Sitzmann FC, Issa IH.
    Ther Ggw; 1970 Dec 15; 109(12):1794-6 passim. PubMed ID: 4924563
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Factors affecting the reliability of screening tests for bacteriuria. II. Dip-slide: false positive results following postal transport and false negatives owing to incubation at room temperature.
    Alwall N.
    Acta Med Scand; 1973 Jun 15; 193(6):505-9. PubMed ID: 4578834
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.