These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. [Rhinomanometric tests of the effect of nasivinettes in normal subjects (author's transl)]. Ey W, Skevas A. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1974 Mar; 53(5):352-7. PubMed ID: 4136431 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [The effect of various aerosols on nasal ventilation (rhinomanometric investigations (author's transl)]. Fendel K, Mlynski G. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1975 Aug; 54(8):630-4. PubMed ID: 129632 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The action of an oral rhinological agent on the nasal mucous membrane (author's transl)]. Schumann K. MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1974 May 24; 116(21):1089-92. PubMed ID: 4135042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rhinomanometry. III. Procedures and criteria for distinction between skeletal stenosis and mucosal swelling. Broms P. Acta Otolaryngol; 1982 May 24; 94(3-4):361-70. PubMed ID: 6183919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Peak nasal inspiratory flow--the plateau effect. Clarke RW, Jones AS, Richardson H. J Laryngol Otol; 1995 May 24; 109(5):399-402. PubMed ID: 7541066 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A new passive anterior rhinometric method for clinical study of nasal decongestant. Cho YW. Int J Clin Pharmacol Biopharm; 1978 Feb 24; 16(2):63-7. PubMed ID: 75861 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Variability in nasal resistance measurements. Cole P, Fastag O, Forsyth R. J Otolaryngol; 1980 Aug 24; 9(4):309-15. PubMed ID: 6158578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of L-menthol stimulation of the major palatine nerve on subjective and objective nasal patency. Naito K, Komori M, Kondo Y, Takeuchi M, Iwata S. Auris Nasus Larynx; 1997 Apr 24; 24(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 9134138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Rhinomanometry-measurement by notwire and strain-ganges (author's transl)]. Müsebeck K, Rosenberg H. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1976 Dec 24; 55(12):950-5. PubMed ID: 138035 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Computerized rhinomanometry: a new method for the clinical exploration of the nasal respiratory function. Corvera G, Corvera J, Ayora MF. Arch Invest Med (Mex); 1985 Dec 24; 16(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 3833095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Nasal airflow resistance: a survey of 2500 assessments. Cole P. Am J Rhinol; 1997 Dec 24; 11(6):415-20. PubMed ID: 9438053 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. How we do it: "The oral tube area method": a new method for self-assessment of nasal resistance. Pontoppidan JM. Clin Otolaryngol; 2005 Dec 24; 30(6):557-60. PubMed ID: 16402985 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Physiological versus pharmacological decongestion of the nose in healthy human subjects. Flanagan P, Eccles R. Acta Otolaryngol; 1998 Jan 24; 118(1):110-3. PubMed ID: 9504174 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [On the decongesting effect of the novel imidazole derivative N-(2-imidazolin-2-yl)-N-(4-indanyl)amine (indanazoline) (author's transl)]. Masing H, Bengel HJ. Arzneimittelforschung; 1980 Jan 24; 30(10):1785-7. PubMed ID: 6159902 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Inspiratory and expiratory effects of nasal breathing. Hairfield WM, Warren DW, Hinton VA, Seaton DL. Cleft Palate J; 1987 Jul 24; 24(3):183-9. PubMed ID: 3477339 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]