These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 4148235

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The separation of sub-populations of T and B lymphocytes.
    Shortman K, Cerottini JC, Brunner KT.
    Eur J Immunol; 1972 Aug; 2(4):313-9. PubMed ID: 4563345
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The presence of immunoregulatory cells in chicken thymus: function in B and T cell responses.
    Moticka EJ.
    J Immunol; 1977 Sep; 119(3):987-92. PubMed ID: 19535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Bursal and postbursal cells in chicken. Separation by gradient centrifugation.
    Toivanen P, Toivanen A, Tamminen P.
    Eur J Immunol; 1974 Mar; 4(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 4211846
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Regulation and suppression of graft-versus-host reaction.
    Nouza K, Pichlílová.
    Allerg Immunol (Leipz); 1973 Mar; 19(2-4):279-89. PubMed ID: 4156162
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Difference in the target cells for tolerance induction in relation to the dose of tolerogen.
    Katsura Y, Kawaguchi S, Muramatsu S.
    Immunology; 1972 Oct; 23(4):537-44. PubMed ID: 4563476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Bursal and postbursal stem cells in chicken. Functional characteristics.
    Toivanen P, Toivanen A.
    Eur J Immunol; 1973 Sep; 3(9):585-95. PubMed ID: 4203295
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of the suppressive effect of thymus cells and the suppression by neonatal application of antigen.
    Droege W.
    Eur J Immunol; 1973 Dec; 3(12):804-11. PubMed ID: 4205558
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Induction of T cell tolerance in agammaglobulinemic chickens.
    Rouse BT, Warner NL.
    Eur J Immunol; 1972 Feb; 2(1):102-4. PubMed ID: 4404275
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Cell interactions in the immune response in vitro. I. Metabolic activities of T cells in a collaborative antibody response.
    Feldmann M, Basten A.
    Eur J Immunol; 1972 Jun; 2(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 4119933
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Histometric analysis of the chicken spleen during primary immune response to soluble bovine serum albumin. II. Mathematical-histometric method for the assessment of quantitative changes of thymus-type and bursa-type lymphocytes.
    Fehér G, Nagy ZA.
    Z Immunitatsforsch Exp Klin Immunol; 1972 May; 143(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 4282912
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. T-cell tolerance in the chicken thymus after transplantation of histoincompatible B cells.
    Lehtonen L, Veromaa T, Toivanen P.
    Transplant Proc; 1992 Feb; 24(1):279-80. PubMed ID: 1531712
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Distinct subpopulations of thymus-dependent lymphocytes. Tracing of the differentiation pathway of T cells by use of preparatively electrophoretically separated mouse lymphocytes.
    Zeiller K, Pascher G, Wagner G, Liebich HG, Holzberg E, Hannig K.
    Immunology; 1974 May; 26(5):995-1012. PubMed ID: 4152839
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The lack of cellular cooperation in the immune response to E. coli 0127.
    Poe WJ, Michael JG.
    J Immunol; 1974 Sep; 113(3):1033-8. PubMed ID: 4607202
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.