These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


82 related items for PubMed ID: 423553

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Critical bandwidth in loudness summation in sensorineural hearing loss.
    Bonding P.
    Br J Audiol; 1979 Feb; 13(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 435656
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Relationship between loudness discomfort level and acoustic reflex threshold for normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired individuals.
    McLeod HL, Greenberg HJ.
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Dec; 22(4):873-83. PubMed ID: 513694
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Measurement and modeling of binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC, Gibbs A, Onions G, Glasberg BR.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):736-47. PubMed ID: 25096108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Suprathreshold auditory processing deficits in noise: Effects of hearing loss and age.
    Kortlang S, Mauermann M, Ewert SD.
    Hear Res; 2016 Jan; 331():27-40. PubMed ID: 26471199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Temporal integration, frequency resolution, and off-frequency listening in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Hall JW, Fernandes MA.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1172-7. PubMed ID: 6643838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The controversial relationship between loudness discomfort levels and acoustic reflex thresholds.
    Ritter R, Johnson RM, Northern JL.
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1979 Oct; 4(4):123-31. PubMed ID: 422423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM, Plomp R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical critical band estimation.
    Bonding P.
    Scand Audiol; 1978 Oct; 7(3):115-23. PubMed ID: 756076
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Loudness discomfort levels of hearing-impaired listeners using speech material.
    Edgerton BJ, Beattie RC, Wides JW.
    Ear Hear; 1980 Oct; 1(4):206-10. PubMed ID: 7409357
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Relations between psychophysical data and speech perception for hearing-impaired subjects. II.
    Dreschler WA, Plomp R.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1261-70. PubMed ID: 4056220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.