These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


225 related items for PubMed ID: 4246319

  • 1. [Particularities of electroencephalographic audiometry in children].
    Charachon D, Morgon A, Gerin P.
    J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac (1967); 1970 May; 19(5):375-80. PubMed ID: 4246319
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. [Audiological and psychological aspects of hearing tests in young children].
    Ciurea M, Eschenasy S.
    Pediatria (Bucur); 1967 May; 16(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 5591074
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Evoked cerebral potentials in clinical practice].
    Morgon A, Charachon D, Gerin P.
    J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac (1967); 1970 Nov; 19(9):731-4. PubMed ID: 4250348
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Audiometry in children].
    van Strijthem YM.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1972 Nov; 26():Suppl 2:3-132. PubMed ID: 4580508
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Experience with electrocochleography in objective measurement of hearing in children].
    Mathis A, Graf K.
    Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1974 Jun 22; 104(25):886-92. PubMed ID: 4837025
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Complementarity of audiometry with evoked EEG potentials and impedance measurements in deaf children].
    Demanez JP, Lhonneux-Ledoux F.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1974 Jun 22; 28(4-5):409-17. PubMed ID: 4440471
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Audiometry in children].
    Plath P.
    HNO; 1973 Mar 22; 21(3):65-8. PubMed ID: 4700442
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Electrocochleography or evoked cortical responses: which is preferable in diagnosis of hearing loss.
    Sohmer H, Pratt H, Feinmesser M.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974 Mar 22; 95(7-8):515-22. PubMed ID: 4460144
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Present day scope and limitations of evoked response audiometry.
    Beagley HA.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1971 Nov 22; 92():Suppl:753-63. PubMed ID: 5148989
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. An electrophysiological test of infant hearing.
    Stein LK.
    Am Ann Deaf; 1976 Jun 22; 121(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 986760
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.