These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
142 related items for PubMed ID: 426501
21. Comparative in-vitro activity of ticarcillin and carbenicillin against 100 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Pearman JW, Kosaras FP, Harper WE. Med J Aust; 1978 Apr 22; 1(8):452-4. PubMed ID: 96319 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Selection of variants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant of Beta-lactam antibiotics. Gwynn MN, Rolinson GN. Infection; 1980 Apr 22; 8(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 6771215 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of mezlocillin, piperacillin, Bay k 4999 with carbenicillin and ticarcillin against enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sobel JD, Levison ME, Kaye D. Infection; 1980 Apr 22; 8(3):121-2. PubMed ID: 6448229 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Effects of inoculum size on the activity of carboxy- and ureido-penicillins and effects of combinations of ureido-penicillins with aminoglycosides against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Watanakunakorn C. J Antimicrob Chemother; 1986 Jan 22; 17(1):91-5. PubMed ID: 3081474 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Susceptibility of ampicillin-resistant Haemophilus influenzae to seven penicillins. Thornsberry C, Baker CN, Kirven LA, Swenson JM. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jan 22; 9(1):70-3. PubMed ID: 1083202 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. BL-P1654, ticarcillin, and carbenicillin: in vitro comparison alone and in combination with gentamicin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Wald ER, Standiford HC, Tatem BA, Calia FM, Hornick RB. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1975 Mar 22; 7(3):336-40. PubMed ID: 806263 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of in vitro activity of moxalactam (LY127935) with cefazolin, amikacin, tobramycin, carbenicillin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin against 420 blood culture isolates. Reimer LG, Mirrett S, Reller LB. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Mar 22; 17(3):412-6. PubMed ID: 6448577 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative antibacterial activity of azlocillin, mezlocillin, carbenicillin and ticarcillin and relative stability to beta-lactamases of pseudomonas aeruginosa and klebsiella aerogenes. Basker MJ, Edmondson RA, Sutherland R. Infection; 1979 Mar 22; 7(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 108220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Piperacillin (T-1220), a new semisynthetic penicillin: in vitro antimicrobial activity comparison with carbenicillin, ticarcillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, cefamandole and cefoxitin. Jones RN, Thornsberry C, Barry AL, Fuchs PC, Gavan TL, Gerlach EH. J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1977 Dec 22; 30(12):1107-14. PubMed ID: 599084 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparative activity of mezlocillin, penicillin, ampicillin, carbenicillin, and ticarcillin against gram-positive bacteria and Haemophilus influenzae. Sanders CC. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Dec 22; 20(6):843-6. PubMed ID: 6459766 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Cefsulodin: antibacterial activity and tentative interpretive zone standards for the disk susceptibility test. Barry AL, Jones RN, Thornsberry C. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1981 Oct 22; 20(4):525-9. PubMed ID: 6211134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Susceptibility of the Bacteroides fragilis group of anaerobes to carbenicillin and ticarcillin. Garcia Rodriguez JA, Garcia Sanchez JE, Gomez Garcia AC, Prieto Prieto J. J Antimicrob Chemother; 1978 May 22; 4(3):284-6. PubMed ID: 670123 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro activity of mezlocillin and azlocillin compared with that of four other penicillins and two aminoglycosides. Barry AL, Thornsberry C, Jones RN, Gavan TL. Cleve Clin Q; 1980 May 22; 47(4):311-9. PubMed ID: 6451334 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of disc-diffusion and plate-incorporation susceptibility testing of gram-negative bacilli to ticarcillin, piperacillin and ticarcillin/clavulanate. Elston RA, Swann RA, Fraise A. J Antimicrob Chemother; 1989 Feb 22; 23(2):285-7. PubMed ID: 2708186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of ticarcillin and carbenicillin activity against random and select populations Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Prior RB, Fass RJ. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Feb 22; 13(2):184-7. PubMed ID: 417671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. The comparative synergistic activity of amikacin, gentamicin, netilmicin and azlocillin, mezlocillin, carbenicillin and ticarcillin against Serratia marcescens. Fu KP, Neu HC. J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1978 Feb 22; 31(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 344298 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Tobramycin inactivation by carbenicillin, ticarcillin, and piperacillin. Konishi H, Goto M, Nakamoto Y, Yamamoto I, Yamashina H. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1983 May 22; 23(5):653-7. PubMed ID: 6223576 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of the activities of the new ureidopenicillins piperacillin, mezlocillin, azlocillin, and Bay k 4999 against gram-negative organisms. Verbist L. Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Aug 22; 16(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 485123 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative in vitro susceptibilities of 504 bacteremic isolates to ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid and other antimicrobial agents. Rotstein C, Amsterdam D, Beam T, Gorzynski E. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis; 1989 Aug 22; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 2752713 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]