These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

142 related items for PubMed ID: 436406

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Biostatistics Series Module 4: Comparing Groups - Categorical Variables.
    Hazra A, Gogtay N.
    Indian J Dermatol; 2016; 61(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 27512183
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Dynamics of chronic gastritis in the remnant after partial gastrectomy for duodenal ulcer.
    Kekki M, Saukkonen M, Sipponen P, Varis K, Siurala M.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 1980; 15(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 7433915
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Comparison of product moment and rank correlation coefficients in the assessment of laboratory method-comparison data.
    Cornbleet PJ, Shea MC.
    Clin Chem; 1978 Jun; 24(6):857-61. PubMed ID: 657471
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Computation of the quasi-independence model for the analysis of triangular contingency tables.
    Aktaş S.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Jan; 89(1):72-5. PubMed ID: 18037188
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Testing independence in two-way contingency tables with data subject to misclassification.
    Assakul K, Proctor CH.
    Psychometrika; 1967 Mar; 32(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 5232573
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A comparison of test statistics for assessing the effects of concomitant variables in survival analysis.
    Lee KL, Harrell FE, Tolley HD, Rosati RA.
    Biometrics; 1983 Jun; 39(2):341-50. PubMed ID: 6626661
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Differential item functioning analysis by applying multiple comparison procedures.
    Eusebi P, Kreiner S.
    J Appl Meas; 2015 Jun; 16(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 25562333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. [Late results of gastrectomy for gastric or duodenal ulcers].
    Herzog KH, Fiege A.
    Chirurg; 1966 Apr; 37(4):159-62. PubMed ID: 5983379
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Veterans Administration cooperative study of surgery for duodenal ulcer. I. Description and evaluation of method of randomization.
    Johnson WD, Grizzle JE, Postlethwait RW.
    Arch Surg; 1970 Sep; 101(3):391-5. PubMed ID: 4914715
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Interpreting the correlation coefficient when one of the variables is discrete.
    Appleton DR, Rugg-Gunn AJ, Hackett AF.
    J Dent Res; 1986 Nov; 65(11):1346-8. PubMed ID: 3478395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Mantel-Haenszel-type inference for cumulative odds ratios with a stratified ordinal response.
    Liu IM, Agresti A.
    Biometrics; 1996 Dec; 52(4):1223-34. PubMed ID: 8962452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.