These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

91 related items for PubMed ID: 438389

  • 1. Receiver operating characteristic curves in the evaluation of hard copies of computed tomography scans.
    Ritchings RT, Isherwood I, Pullan BR, Kingsley D.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Jun; 3(3):423-5. PubMed ID: 438389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Urinary calculi on computed radiography: comparison of observer performance with hard-copy versus soft-copy images on different viewer systems.
    Kim AY, Cho KS, Song KS, Kim JH, Kim JG, Ha HK.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Aug; 177(2):331-5. PubMed ID: 11461856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparison of X-ray film and photographic paper in recording CT images.
    Stephenson TF, Lincoln AJ, Mehnert PJ, Paul GJ.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1984 Dec; 8(6):1161-3. PubMed ID: 6501624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Analog image recording using a laser printer and paper system.
    Cox GG, Johnson JA, Templeton AW, Preston DF, Lee KR, Nelson DL, Hensley KS, Dwyer SJ.
    Invest Radiol; 1985 Dec; 20(9):1003-7. PubMed ID: 3908385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Accuracy of bedside chest hard-copy screen-film versus hard- and soft-copy computed radiographs in a medical intensive care unit: receiver operating characteristic analysis.
    Kundel HL, Gefter W, Aronchick J, Miller W, Hatabu H, Whitfill CH, Miller W.
    Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):859-63. PubMed ID: 9393548
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Contrast and latitude of CT hard copy: an ROC study.
    Warren RC.
    Radiology; 1981 Oct; 141(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 7291519
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Evaluation of the image quality of ink-jet printed paper copies of digital chest radiographs as compared with film: a receiver operating characteristic study.
    Lyttkens K, Kirkhorn T, Kehler M, Andersson B, Ebbesen A, Hochbergs P, Jarlman O, Lindberg CG, Holmer NG.
    J Digit Imaging; 1994 May; 7(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 8075185
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Receiver-operating-characteristic study of chest radiographs in children: digital hard-copy film vs 2K x 2K soft-copy images.
    Razavi M, Sayre JW, Taira RK, Simons M, Huang HK, Chuang KS, Rahbar G, Kangarloo H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Feb; 158(2):443-8. PubMed ID: 1729805
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Hard-copy versus soft-copy image reading for detection of ureteral stones on abdominal radiography.
    Ueda K, Iwasaki S, Nagasawa M, Sueyoshi S, Takahama J, Ide K, Kichikawa K.
    Radiat Med; 2003 Feb; 21(5):210-3. PubMed ID: 14632296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. CT scanner comparison.
    Southon FC.
    Med Phys; 1981 Feb; 8(1):62-75. PubMed ID: 7207429
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Contrast--detail--dose analysis of six different computed tomographic scanners.
    Cohen G.
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Apr; 3(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 429628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Contrast-detail assessment of computed tomography scanners.
    Faulkner K, Moores BM.
    Phys Med Biol; 1986 Sep; 31(9):993-1003. PubMed ID: 3774879
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Excretory urography using computed radiography.
    Fajardo LL, Hillman BJ, Hunter TB, Claypool HR, Westerman BR, Mockbee B.
    Radiology; 1987 Feb; 162(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 3797646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. A comparison of hard and soft copies processed with linear conversion and nonlinear conversion of skeletal fractures--a preliminary study.
    Kaji T, Katayama M, Kosuda S, Kusano S.
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):45-50. PubMed ID: 7734540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 5.