These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
137 related items for PubMed ID: 440277
1. FTC eyes hospital-BC relations. Simler SL. Mod Healthc; 1979 Jun; 9(6):28. PubMed ID: 440277 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. FTC charges MDs control Blue Shield. Am Med News; 1979 May 18; 22(20):2. PubMed ID: 10242441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. FTC is cautious about health-plan rule on eve of Senate debate of agency power. Wall St J Midwest Ed; 1980 Feb 06; 60(80):14. PubMed ID: 10245673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. FTC eyes ban of M.D. input into HMOs, Blues. Mod Healthc; 1979 Dec 06; 9(12):32. PubMed ID: 503022 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. FTC moves more slowly against physician control in Blue Shield and other open-panel health plans. Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1980 May 06; 34(11):49, 111. PubMed ID: 10278064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Michigan law treats Blues plan like public agency, not private institution. LaViolette S. Mod Healthc; 1981 Mar 06; 11(3):34, 36. PubMed ID: 10250327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Physician agreements to control medical prepayment plans: Federal Trade Commission. Notice of initiation of case-by-case law enforcement program. Fed Regist; 1981 May 21; 46(98):27768-9. PubMed ID: 10251259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Minimizing antitrust risks of Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans. Steele CJ. J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1988 May 21; 4():227-72. PubMed ID: 10288422 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Plan contracts with providers: cost containment objectives amid conflicting legislative schemes. Heitler G, Ader M. J Leg Med; 1981 Sep 21; 2(3):265-96. PubMed ID: 6976401 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Challenge to Blues' tax-exemption seen as signal to healthcare industry. Anderson HJ, Baldwin MF. Mod Healthc; 1985 Dec 06; 15(25):18-20. PubMed ID: 10274654 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Blues' discount policy seen as antitrust issue. Burda D. Hospitals; 1986 Nov 05; 60(21):36. PubMed ID: 3770662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. "Blues interfered illegally with HMO.". Burda D. Mod Healthc; 1987 Nov 20; 17(24):12. PubMed ID: 10284683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. On "FTC Sings the Blues" and its respondents. Weller CD. J Health Polit Policy Law; 1982 Nov 20; 7(2):547-58. PubMed ID: 7108176 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Court decisions give Blues plans one win, one loss in separate antitrust cases. Halper HR, Kazon PM. Bus Health; 1987 Mar 20; 4(5):51-2. PubMed ID: 10280673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The Insurance Bureau, the Blues and the prospective reimbursement system. Cohn A. Mich Hosp; 1978 Aug 20; 14(8):8-11. PubMed ID: 10308444 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Court upholds Blues' fee discounts. Burda D. Mod Healthc; 1989 Sep 01; 19(35):3. PubMed ID: 10324683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. St. Francis Hospital takes on the Blues. Haradine J. Mich Hosp; 1978 Mar 01; 14(3):21-2. PubMed ID: 10306418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Vertical restraints among hospitals, physicians and health insurers that raise rivals' costs. A case study of Reazin v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Kansas, Inc. and Ocean State Physicians Health Plan, Inc. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Rhode Island. Baker JB. Am J Law Med; 1988 Mar 01; 14(2-3):147-69. PubMed ID: 3245541 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Va. report: drop special rules for Blues. Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1978 Nov 04; 82(44):2, 26. PubMed ID: 10238875 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Legal challenges test relationships between Ohio hospitals, Blues plans. Richman D. Mod Healthc; 1986 Jul 04; 16(14):74. PubMed ID: 10277194 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]