These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

127 related items for PubMed ID: 442997

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Differences between electrode-assigned frequencies and cochlear implant recipient pitch perception.
    Nardo WD, Cantore I, Cianfrone F, Melillo P, Fetoni AR, Paludetti G.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2007 Apr; 127(4):370-7. PubMed ID: 17453456
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Intracochlear misdirected implantation of a cochlear implant.
    Tange RA, Grolman W, Maat A.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 Jun; 126(6):650-2. PubMed ID: 16720451
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. [Biomaterials in cochlear implants].
    Stöver T, Lenarz T.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2009 May; 88 Suppl 1():S12-31. PubMed ID: 19353453
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. A preliminary report on a multiple-channel cochlear implant operation.
    Tong YC, Black RC, Clark GM, Forster IC, Millar JB, O'Loughlin BJ, Patrick JF.
    J Laryngol Otol; 1979 Jul; 93(7):679-95. PubMed ID: 469398
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. The relation between electrophysiologic channel interaction and electrode pitch ranking in cochlear implant recipients.
    Hughes ML, Abbas PJ.
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Mar; 119(3):1527-37. PubMed ID: 16583898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Ineraid cochlear implant in the ossified cochlea: surgical techniques and results.
    Montandon PB, Boëx C, Pelizzone M.
    Am J Otol; 1994 Nov; 15(6):748-51. PubMed ID: 8572086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. The clinical value of single electrode systems in auditory prostheses.
    House WF.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1978 Feb; 11(1):201-8. PubMed ID: 662347
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Place pitch discrimination and speech recognition in cochlear implant users.
    Hanekom JJ, Shannon RV.
    S Afr J Commun Disord; 1996 Feb; 43():27-40. PubMed ID: 9265842
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52. The Relationship Between Insertion Angles, Default Frequency Allocations, and Spiral Ganglion Place Pitch in Cochlear Implants.
    Landsberger DM, Svrakic M, Roland JT, Svirsky M.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Feb; 36(5):e207-13. PubMed ID: 25860624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Genetic variants in the peripheral auditory system significantly affect adult cochlear implant performance.
    Shearer AE, Eppsteiner RW, Frees K, Tejani V, Sloan-Heggen CM, Brown C, Abbas P, Dunn C, Hansen MR, Gantz BJ, Smith RJH.
    Hear Res; 2017 May; 348():138-142. PubMed ID: 28213135
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Pure-Tone Masking Patterns for Monopolar and Phantom Electrical Stimulation in Cochlear Implants.
    Saoji AA, Koka K, Litvak LM, Finley CC.
    Ear Hear; 2018 May; 39(1):124-130. PubMed ID: 28700446
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Music perception of cochlear implant users compared with that of hearing aid users.
    Looi V, McDermott H, McKay C, Hickson L.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):421-34. PubMed ID: 18344870
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U, Rader T, Helbig S, Bahmer A.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Jun; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.