These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

68 related items for PubMed ID: 451199

  • 1. The status of film/screen mammography. Results of the BENT study.
    Jans RG, Butler PF, McCrohan JL, Thompson WE.
    Radiology; 1979 Jul; 132(1):197-200. PubMed ID: 451199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Mammography in the 1990s: the United States and Canada.
    Suleiman OH, Spelic DC, McCrohan JL, Symonds GR, Houn F.
    Radiology; 1999 Feb; 210(2):345-51. PubMed ID: 10207413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Factors affecting increasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina from 1997 through 2001: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
    Pisano ED, Chiu YF, Ni L, Li Y, Britt GG, Johnson RE, Burns B, Cole E, Kuzmiak C, Koomen M, Pavic D.
    Acad Radiol; 2004 May; 11(5):536-43. PubMed ID: 15147618
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Mammographic equipment, technique, and quality control.
    Friedrich MA.
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):571-8. PubMed ID: 1888654
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mammography in the eighties.
    Conway BJ, McCrohan JL, Rueter FG, Suleiman OH.
    Radiology; 1990 Nov; 177(2):335-9. PubMed ID: 2217765
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. A survey of radiation dose and image quality in mammography: an ongoing program in Italy.
    Rimondi O, Gambaccini M, Candini GC, Indovina PL, Rosati A.
    Health Phys; 1987 Apr; 52(4):437-41. PubMed ID: 3570786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Breast exposure: nationwide trends; a mammographic quality assurance program--results to date.
    Jensen JE, Butler PF.
    Radiol Technol; 1978 Apr; 50(3):251-7. PubMed ID: 264140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Factors affecting decreasing radiation dose for mammography in North Carolina after 2002: an analysis of Food and Drug Administration annual surveys.
    Kuzmiak CM, Pisano ED, Chung Y, Britt GG, Burns B, Cole E.
    Acad Radiol; 2007 Jun; 14(6):685-91. PubMed ID: 17502258
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Standardization of image quality and radiation dose in mammography.
    Hendrick RE.
    Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):648-54. PubMed ID: 2305044
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE, Yagan R, Oravec D, Shah Z.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)].
    Weberling R.
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Evaluation of mammographic screen-film systems.
    Arnold BA, Webster EW, Kalisher L.
    Radiology; 1978 Oct; 129(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 693873
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Interest of a combination of film and screen reinforcer in mammography (author's transl)].
    Berry M, Clément JF, Daniel G.
    J Radiol Electrol Med Nucl; 1978 Jan; 59(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 641872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Contrast and dose with Mo-Mo, Mo-Rh, and Rh-Rh target-filter combinations in mammography.
    Gingold EL, Wu X, Barnes GT.
    Radiology; 1995 Jun; 195(3):639-44. PubMed ID: 7753987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Image quality and dose in mammography in 17 countries in Africa, Asia and Eastern Europe: results from IAEA projects.
    Ciraj-Bjelac O, Avramova-Cholakova S, Beganovic A, Economides S, Faj D, Gershan V, Grupetta E, Kharita MH, Milakovic M, Milu C, Muhogora WE, Muthuvelu P, Oola S, Setayeshi S, Schandorf C, Ursulean I, Videnovic IR, Zaman A, Ziliukas J, Rehani MM.
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2161-8. PubMed ID: 21665395
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
    Feig SA.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):897-911. PubMed ID: 3306772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.