These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

176 related items for PubMed ID: 457050

  • 1. A note on the meaning of the Donaldson decision.
    Reinert RE.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Aug; 30(8):563-4. PubMed ID: 457050
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review.
    Weiner BA.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 33(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7095767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. O'Connor v. Donaldson: retelling a classic and finding some revisionist history.
    Behnke SH.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999 Jun; 27(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 10212031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Warren Burger and the civil commitment tetralogy.
    Shuman D.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980 Jun; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7002809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Mental health commitment: the state of the debate, 1980.
    Roth LG.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1980 Jun; 31(6):385-96. PubMed ID: 7380401
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
    Fields JD.
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976 Jun; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. O'Connor v. Donaldson: the Supreme Court sidesteps the right to treatment.
    Winthrop LF.
    Calif West Law Rev; 1976 Jun; 13(1):168-87. PubMed ID: 11664747
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Supreme Court rules against involuntary custodial confinement of the nondangerous mentally ill.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1975 Sep; 26(9):616+. PubMed ID: 11643281
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A review of major implications of the O'Connor v. Donaldson decision.
    Kopolow LE.
    Am J Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 133(4):379-83. PubMed ID: 1267034
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Involuntary psychiatry.
    Szasz TS.
    Univ Cincinnati Law Rev; 1976 Apr; 45(3):347-65. PubMed ID: 11664781
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. o'Connor v. Donaldson: due process rights of mental patients in state hospitals.
    Anderson K.
    Rev Law Soc Change; 1976 Apr; 6(1):65-82. PubMed ID: 11664777
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Evaluations of dangerousness.
    Kress F.
    Schizophr Bull; 1979 Apr; 5(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 462138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. o'Connor v. Donaldson: the death of the quid pro quo argument for a right to treatment?
    Bliss TP.
    Clevel State Law Rev; 1975 Apr; 24(3):557-71. PubMed ID: 11661275
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Changes in the law have improved treatment of the mentally ill.
    Sadoff RL.
    Hospitals; 1981 May 01; 55(9):61-4. PubMed ID: 7216207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson.
    Bernard JL.
    Am Psychol; 1977 Dec 01; 32(12):1085-8. PubMed ID: 596714
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The Supreme Court looks at psychiatry.
    Appelbaum PS.
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Jul 01; 141(7):827-35. PubMed ID: 6731630
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Open Sesame: the Constitution and mental institutions.
    Trotter RJ.
    Sci News; 1975 Jul 12; 108(2):30-1. PubMed ID: 11664469
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?
    Linburn GE.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998 Jul 12; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.