These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

182 related items for PubMed ID: 4574248

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. II. Some considerations relevant to the selection of ECG Program.
    Milliken JA.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May 19; 108(10):1232-8. PubMed ID: 4574246
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. V. Suggested standards for instrumentation in computer processing of electrocardiograms.
    Sherwood JD.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May 19; 108(10):1259-61. PubMed ID: 4574249
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Canadian Colloquium on Computer-Assisted Interpretation of Electrocardiograms. VII. Considerations relevant to a rational transition from the present system to automated ECG analysis.
    Manfreda J, Klassen GA.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1973 May 19; 108(10):1265-8. PubMed ID: 4574251
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. European Conformance Testing Services for computerized electrocardiography. New procedures and standards.
    Zywietz C, Willems JL.
    J Electrocardiol; 1993 May 19; 26 Suppl():137-46. PubMed ID: 8189115
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Evaluation of ECG interpretation results obtained by computer and cardiologists.
    Willems JL, Abreu-Lima C, Arnaud P, Brohet CR, Denis B, Gehring J, Graham I, van Herpen G, Machado H, Michaelis J.
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep 19; 29(4):308-16. PubMed ID: 2233377
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. On designing and testing transformations for derivation of standard 12-lead/18-lead electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms from reduced sets of predictor leads.
    Horácek BM, Warren JW, Wang JJ.
    J Electrocardiol; 2008 Sep 19; 41(3):220-9. PubMed ID: 18433613
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative accuracy of automated computer analysis versus physicans in training in the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Sekiguchi K, Kanda T, Osada M, Tsunoda Y, Kodajima N, Fukumura Y, Suzuki T, Kobayashi I.
    J Med; 1999 Sep 19; 30(1-2):75-81. PubMed ID: 10515243
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of the normal values for signal-averaged electrocardiogram.
    Marcus FI, Zareba W, Sherrill D.
    J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Feb 19; 18(2):231-3. PubMed ID: 17338774
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. QRS axis validation in clinical electrocardiography.
    Spodick DH, Frisella M, Apiyassawat S.
    Am J Cardiol; 2008 Jan 15; 101(2):268-9. PubMed ID: 18178420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.