These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

80 related items for PubMed ID: 4574869

  • 1. [Comparative study of API system, Enterotube and the usual method for identifying Enterobacteriaceae].
    Bourgaux-Ramoisy D, Béland S, Brochu B.
    Vie Med Can Fr; 1973; 2(2):107-9. PubMed ID: 4574869
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mastroeni P, Carbone M, Fera MT, Teti G.
    G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.
    Hayek LJ, Willis GW.
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T, Persson B, Jensen MM.
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Enterotube system on Enterobacteriaceae differentiation in a routine microbiological laboratory (author's transl)].
    Breierová A, Hústavová H, Krcméry V.
    Cesk Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 1977 Jan; 26(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 140010
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A clinical evaluation of the API microtube system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Brooks KA, Jens M, Sodeman TM.
    Am J Med Technol; 1974 Feb; 40(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 4591715
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [The effect of resuscitation on the results obtained in identification of enterobacteriaceae by the API system (author's transl)].
    de Blaauw LH, de Pijper FW.
    Tijdschr Diergeneeskd; 1977 Dec 01; 102(23):1376-9. PubMed ID: 337567
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Comparison of two systems for identifying coliform enterobacteria newly described or rarely found in clinical practice].
    Renaud F, Freney J, Gavini F, Boeufgras JM, Fleurette J.
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1990 Dec 01; 48(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 2188531
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The enterotube system in the identification of Enterobacteriaceae and Yersinia.
    Finlayson MH, Gibbs B.
    S Afr Med J; 1974 Feb 13; 48(7):257-8. PubMed ID: 4592322
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of the Roche Cobas IDA and Enterotube II systems for identifying members of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Holmes B.
    J Clin Microbiol; 1989 May 13; 27(5):1027-30. PubMed ID: 2663910
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Clinical comparison of the enterotube II and API 20E systems for bacterial identification.
    Leighton PM, Little JA.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Mar 13; 79(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 6338701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.