These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

239 related items for PubMed ID: 4587889

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Sequential hemodynamic patterns in various causes of shock.
    Shoemaker WC.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1971 Mar; 132(3):411-23. PubMed ID: 4925940
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Modern concepts of surgical shock.
    Stortenbeek W.
    Arch Chir Neerl; 1973 Mar; 25(2):215-25. PubMed ID: 4614717
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Physiology of venous return. An unappreciated boost to the heart.
    Rothe CF.
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 May; 146(5):977-82. PubMed ID: 3516108
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Use of monitoring to improve survival in shock.
    Niazi A, Beckman C, Shatney C, Lillehei RC.
    Geriatrics; 1975 Jul; 30(7):93-108. PubMed ID: 1140572
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Importance of venous return, venous resistance, and mean circulatory pressure in the physiology and management of shock.
    Bressack MA, Raffin TA.
    Chest; 1987 Nov; 92(5):906-12. PubMed ID: 3665608
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Counterpoint: the classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is not correct.
    Brengelmann GL.
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Nov; 101(5):1525-6; discussion 1526-7. PubMed ID: 17043330
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Point: the classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is/is not correct.
    Magder S.
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Nov; 101(5):1523-5. PubMed ID: 16825521
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is/is not correct.
    Pinsky MR.
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Nov; 101(5):1528. PubMed ID: 16931559
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. The classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is/is not correct.
    Magder S.
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Nov; 101(5):1533. PubMed ID: 16931558
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The classical Guyton view that mean systemic pressure, right atrial pressure, and venous resistance govern venous return is/is not correct.
    Brengelmann GL.
    J Appl Physiol (1985); 2006 Nov; 101(5):1532. PubMed ID: 17043333
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The effect of haemorrhagic hypovolaemia on the haemodynamics of the right and left heart and the pulmonary blood volume.
    Kasalický J, Ulrych M, Widimský J, P0isa Z.
    Cor Vasa; 1967 Nov; 9(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 6077122
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Cardiac preload and venous return in swimming sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.).
    Sandblom E, Farrell AP, Altimiras J, Axelsson M, Claireaux G.
    J Exp Biol; 2005 May; 208(Pt 10):1927-35. PubMed ID: 15879073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. [Effects of experimental hypovolaemic shock on platelets in the pig (author's transl)].
    Burghuber O, Binder B, Koch M, Lehr L, Mitsch A, Wagner M.
    Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1977 May 13; 89(10):341-5. PubMed ID: 868028
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Respiratory regulation of splanchnic and systemic venous return in normal subjects and in patients with hepatic cirrhosis.
    Moreno AH, Burchell AR.
    Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1982 Feb 13; 154(2):257-67. PubMed ID: 7058489
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.