These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
193 related items for PubMed ID: 4602064
1. Double-blind study of four oral cholecystographic preparations. Parks RE. Radiology; 1974 Sep; 112(3):525-8. PubMed ID: 4602064 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of three cholecystographic agents. A double-blind study with and without a prior fatty meal. Stanley RJ, Melson GL, Cubillo E, Hesker AE. Radiology; 1974 Sep; 112(3):513-7. PubMed ID: 4602063 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical comparison of two contrast agents for oral cholecystography: radiologic efficacy and drug safety of iopanoic acid and iopronic acid. Hedlund L, Putman CE, Burrell M. Yale J Biol Med; 1979 Sep; 52(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 380184 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of oral cholecystopaques: iopronic acid vs. iopanoic acid. Amberg JR, Goldberger LA, Bates M. Radiology; 1980 Jan; 134(1):31-2. PubMed ID: 6985742 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical comparison of tyropanoate sodium, ipodate sodium, and iopanoic acid. Russell JG, Frederick PR. Radiology; 1974 Sep; 112(3):519-23. PubMed ID: 4843279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. A new contrast agent for oral cholecystography: iopronic acid (Oravue). Pizzolato NF, Arcomano JP, Baum AE. AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 May; 130(5):845-7. PubMed ID: 417581 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Time of optimal gallbladder opacification with bilopaque (tyropanoate sodium). Oliphant M, Whalen JP, Evans JA. Radiology; 1974 Sep; 112(3):531-2. PubMed ID: 4843281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Double-blind study of a new gallbladder contrast medium]. Fork FT. Lakartidningen; 1977 Mar 09; 74(10):915-7. PubMed ID: 138777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of diet and fasting on gallbladder opacification during oral cholecystography in dogs as measured by computed tomography. Fon GT, Hunter TB, Berk RN, Capp MP. Radiology; 1980 Sep 09; 136(3):585-92. PubMed ID: 7403534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Effects of three oral cholecystographic agents on laboratory data. Clinical chemical determinations and urinary tests (author's transl)]. Kasezawa N, Tazawa R, Urushibata S, Kobayashi M. Rinsho Byori; 1974 Jun 09; 22(6):440-4. PubMed ID: 4472714 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the opacifying characteristics and pharmacologic responses of iocetamic acid (Cholebrine), a new oral cholecystographic agent, with sodium tyropanoate (Bilopaque). Wishart DL, Dotter CT. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med; 1973 Oct 09; 119(2):429-32. PubMed ID: 4748234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Gallbladder density and iodine concentration in humans during oral cholecystography. A comparison of iopanoic acid and iopronic acid. Thompson WM, Meyers WC, Shaw M, Bates M, Johnson GA, Hedlund LW. Invest Radiol; 1982 Oct 09; 17(6):621-8. PubMed ID: 6759456 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The effect of fasting on gallbladder opacification during oral cholecystography: a controlled study in normal volunteers. Loeb PM, Berk RN, Janes JO, Perkin L, Moore J. Radiology; 1978 Feb 09; 126(2):395-401. PubMed ID: 341220 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [The effect of diarrhea on gallbladder opacification during oral cholecystography: comparison of two cholecystographic agents (author's transl)]. Fukuda K, Nanjo M, Harada J, Sekiya T, Kanehira Y, Anno I, Takayama M, Watanabe H, Yamada T, Yamaguchi M, Tada S. Rinsho Hoshasen; 1979 Mar 09; 24(3):379-84. PubMed ID: 547079 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Recent triiodinated contrast media for oral cholecystocholangiography]. Sviridov NK, Popova ZP, Varfolomeeva VN. Med Radiol (Mosk); 1985 Feb 09; 30(2):58-60. PubMed ID: 3155821 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparative trial of two oral cholecystographic contrast media--iocetamic acid (Cholebrin) and iopanoic acid (Telepaque). Fielding JA, Whitehouse GH. Clin Radiol; 1979 Jan 09; 30(1):45-8. PubMed ID: 154372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparative trial of three oral cholecystographic contrast media--iocetamic acid, iopanoic acid and sodium ipodate. Cargill A, Hately W. Br J Radiol; 1981 Jan 09; 54(637):79-80. PubMed ID: 6449974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of iocetamic acid and sodium iopodate in cholecystography. Golberg B. Radiol Clin (Basel); 1977 Jan 09; 46(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 136669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Uricosuric action of cholecystographic agents. A possible factor in nephrotoxicity. Mudge GH. N Engl J Med; 1971 Apr 29; 284(17):929-33. PubMed ID: 5551801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical trial of bilopaque (tyropanoate sodium) oral cholecystography. Evaluation of time for the optimal and peak opacification of the gallbladder. Han SY, Witten DM. Radiology; 1974 Sep 29; 112(3):529-30. PubMed ID: 4843280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]