These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

107 related items for PubMed ID: 4620796

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L, Seymour KG, Samarawickrama D, Zou L, Cherukara G, Patel M.
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S, Varvara G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Trayless brush-and-syringe impressions and tray-supported impressions compared by stereophotogrammetry.
    Siirilä HS, Nevakari K.
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1972 Apr; 68(2):53-7. PubMed ID: 4565327
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Influences of hardness of heavy-body-type silicone impression materials on dimensional accuracy of stone dies].
    Nakamura Y.
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1986 Sep; 12(3):343-66. PubMed ID: 3333101
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prevention of failures in making impressions and dies.
    Harrison JD.
    Dent Clin North Am; 1979 Jan; 23(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 365629
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. [Dimensional measures of plaster samples obtained with silicone impressions (b)].
    Hoffer E, Pignanelli M.
    Riv Ital Stomatol; 1976 Jan; (3):5-15. PubMed ID: 1076818
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Dimensional accuracy of dental casts: influence of tray material, impression material, and time.
    Thongthammachat S, Moore BK, Barco MT, Hovijitra S, Brown DT, Andres CJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Jun; 11(2):98-108. PubMed ID: 12087547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dimensional accuracy of 2-stage putty-wash impressions: influence of impression trays and viscosity.
    Balkenhol M, Ferger P, Wöstmann B.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2007 Jun; 20(6):573-5. PubMed ID: 18069363
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH, Johnson GH, Lepe X, Wataha JC.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of five impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of master models.
    Fenske C.
    Braz Dent J; 2000 May; 11(1):19-27. PubMed ID: 11210270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of measurement site on the dimensional accuracy of die-forming materials and techniques.
    Petrie CS, Walker MP, Theodotou N, Glaros AG, Williams K.
    Gen Dent; 2004 May; 52(3):228-32. PubMed ID: 15206253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Dimensional accuracy of 3 silicone dental impression materials.
    Hassan AK.
    East Mediterr Health J; 2006 Sep; 12(5):632-6. PubMed ID: 17333804
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.