These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

201 related items for PubMed ID: 462138

  • 1. Evaluations of dangerousness.
    Kress F.
    Schizophr Bull; 1979; 5(2):211-7. PubMed ID: 462138
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A note on the meaning of the Donaldson decision.
    Reinert RE.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1979 Aug; 30(8):563-4. PubMed ID: 457050
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Donaldson revisited: is dangerousness a constitutional requirement for civil commitment?
    Linburn GE.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1998 Aug; 26(3):343-51. PubMed ID: 9785278
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Components of dangerousness: legal standard in civil commitment.
    Hiday VA, Markell SJ.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980 Aug; 3(4):405-19. PubMed ID: 7275438
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Dangerousness: legal determinations and clinical speculations.
    Birns H, Levien JS.
    Psychiatr Q; 1980 Aug; 52(2):108-31. PubMed ID: 7403374
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. O'Connor v. Donaldson: retelling a classic and finding some revisionist history.
    Behnke SH.
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999 Aug; 27(1):115-26. PubMed ID: 10212031
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Implications of the Donaldson decision: a model for periodic review of committed patients.
    Crane L, Zonana H, Wizner S.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1977 Nov; 28(11):827-33. PubMed ID: 410723
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Supreme Court decisions on mental health: a review.
    Weiner BA.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Jun; 33(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7095767
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The significance for psychology of O'Connor v. Donaldson.
    Bernard JL.
    Am Psychol; 1977 Dec; 32(12):1085-8. PubMed ID: 596714
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. O'Connor v. Donaldson: constitutional law--mental health--a state cannot constitutionally confine without more, a nondangerous individual adjudged to be mentally ill.
    Fields JD.
    Hofstra Law Rev; 1976 Dec; 4(2):511-30. PubMed ID: 11664626
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Redefining dangerousness for civil commitment.
    Rachlin S.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1987 Aug; 38(8):884-6. PubMed ID: 3610091
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Warren Burger and the civil commitment tetralogy.
    Shuman D.
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 1980 Aug; 3(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 7002809
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. O'Connor v. Donaldson: impact in the states.
    Clayton T.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1976 Apr; 27(4):272-81. PubMed ID: 1261980
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Involuntary admission--a century of experience.
    Schwartz L.
    J Clin Psychiatry; 1982 Jan; 43(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 7054153
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The psychiatric evaluation of dangerousness in two trial court jurisdictions.
    Forst ML.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1977 Jan; 5(1):98-110. PubMed ID: 912126
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.