These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

127 related items for PubMed ID: 4656820

  • 1. Order of report and order of scanning in tachistoscopic recognition.
    Scheerer E.
    Can J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 26(4):382-90. PubMed ID: 4656820
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Parellel and serial processing in tachistoscopic recognition: two mechanisms.
    Dick AO.
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Nov; 96(1):60-6. PubMed ID: 5083131
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A further test of the scanning hypothesis in tachistoscopic recognition.
    Scheerer E.
    Can J Psychol; 1973 Mar; 27(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 4696075
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Does post-exposural directional scanning offer a sufficient explanation for lateral differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    McKeever WF.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 4815516
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Some factors in the recognition of tachistoscopically presented alphabetical arrays.
    Fudin R, Kenny JT.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Dec; 35(3):951-9. PubMed ID: 4643992
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    White MJ.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The time course of lateral asymmetries in visual perception of letters.
    Wilkins A, Stewart A.
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 May; 102(5):905-8. PubMed ID: 4847740
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Laterality differences in tachistoscopic word recognition in normal and delayed readers in elementary school.
    Olson ME.
    Neuropsychologia; 1973 Jul; 11(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 4792185
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Tachistoscopic word recognition performance under conditions of simultaneous bilateral presentation.
    Mackavey W, Curcio F, Rosen J.
    Neuropsychologia; 1975 Jan; 13(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1109458
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Recall of successive brief percepts.
    Baba Y, Donderi D.
    Can J Psychol; 1972 Dec; 26(4):326-35. PubMed ID: 4656818
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Perceptual laterality and iconic recognition of visual materials by Karsakoff patients and normal adults.
    Oscar-Berman M, Goodglass H, Cherlow DG.
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1973 Feb; 82(2):316-21. PubMed ID: 4695040
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Hemispheric asymmetries in tachistoscopic information-processing.
    White MJ.
    Br J Psychol; 1972 Nov; 63(4):497-508. PubMed ID: 4574450
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Extraneous lateral stimulation and distribution of errors within tachistoscopic patterns.
    Nice DS.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):1234. PubMed ID: 4711975
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Recall of letters from the left and right visual half-fields under unilater and bilateral presentation.
    Hines D.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):531-9. PubMed ID: 1272699
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Scanning chunking, and the familiarity effect in tachistoscopic recognition.
    Mewhort DJ.
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):69-71. PubMed ID: 5013341
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Role of visual acuity in tachistoscopic recognition of three-letter words.
    Curcio F, Mackavey W, Rosen J.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):755-61. PubMed ID: 4842430
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evidence that fixation digits can contribute to visual field asymmetries in lateralized tachistoscopic tasks.
    McKeever WF, van Eys P.
    Brain Cogn; 1986 Oct; 5(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 3580187
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Integration of post-exposural directional scanning and cerebral dominance explanations of lateral differences in trachistoscopic recognition.
    Fudin R, Masterson CC.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 1272678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Hemispheric differences in serial versus parallel precessing.
    Cohen G.
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar; 97(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 4705242
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Laterality differences in perception: a review.
    White MJ.
    Psychol Bull; 1969 Dec; 72(6):387-405. PubMed ID: 4905908
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.