These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


196 related items for PubMed ID: 4657527

  • 1. Perception of direction in the right and left visual fields.
    Fontenot DJ, Benton AL.
    Neuropsychologia; 1972 Dec; 10(4):447-52. PubMed ID: 4657527
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Hemispheric cerebral dominance.
    Benton AL.
    Isr J Med Sci; 1970 Dec; 6(2):294-303. PubMed ID: 4918561
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Tactile perception of direction in relation to hemispheric locus of lesion.
    Fontenot DJ, Benton AL.
    Neuropsychologia; 1971 Mar; 9(1):83-8. PubMed ID: 5146489
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Right visual field superiority for letter recognition with partial report.
    Hirata K, Bryden MP.
    Can J Psychol; 1976 Sep; 30(3):134-9. PubMed ID: 1000405
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Agenesis of the corpus callosum: a further behavioural investigation.
    Ettlinger G, Blakemore CB, Milner AD, Wilson J.
    Brain; 1974 Jun; 97(2):225-34. PubMed ID: 4434175
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Hemispheric differences in the discrimination of line orientation.
    Umiltà C, Rizzolatti G, Marzi CA, Zamboni G, Franzini C, Camarda R, Berlucchi G.
    Neuropsychologia; 1974 Mar; 12(2):165-74. PubMed ID: 4210380
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    White MJ.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Tachistoscopic recognition of line orientation.
    Sasanuma S, Kobayashi Y.
    Neuropsychologia; 1978 Apr; 16(2):239-42. PubMed ID: 692850
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Hemispheric specialization in commissurotomized man.
    Nebes RD.
    Psychol Bull; 1974 Jan; 81(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 4590870
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Hemispheric differences in evoked potentials to verbal and nonverbal stimuli in the left and right visual fields.
    Buchsbaum M, Fedio P.
    Physiol Behav; 1970 Feb; 5(2):207-10. PubMed ID: 5525797
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hemispheric asymmetry: verbal and spatial encoding of visual stimuli.
    Geffen G, Bradshaw JL, Nettleton NC.
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Sep; 95(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 5070292
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Parallel but temporally displaced visual half-field metacontrast functions.
    McKeever WF, Suberi M.
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1974 May; 26(2):258-65. PubMed ID: 4840122
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. [Dominance of a hemisphere and optical perception with tachistoscope examination].
    Deegener G.
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1974 Apr; 26(4):193-201. PubMed ID: 4848523
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.