These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
328 related items for PubMed ID: 4660894
1. [Cytological diagnosis of cancer of the uterine cervix. Results during 1971]. Gerber E, Vajda D. Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1972 Oct; 92(10):813-28. PubMed ID: 4660894 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. False negative rate in mass screening for cervical cancer. Sato S, Mikino H, Matsunaga G, Yajima A. Acta Cytol; 1998 Oct; 42(3):836-7. PubMed ID: 9622728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The significance of endocervical cells in the diagnosis of cervical epithelial changes. Elias A, Linthorst G, Bekker B, Vooijs PG. Acta Cytol; 1983 Oct; 27(3):225-9. PubMed ID: 6575534 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Results of early diagnosis of cervix carcinoma between 1962-1968]. Kohl H. Zentralbl Gynakol; 1970 May 30; 92(22):691-9. PubMed ID: 5513142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of pipette and smear methods in population screenings for carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Klinken L, Koch F, Albrechtsen R. Dan Med Bull; 1972 Jun 30; 19(4):138-40. PubMed ID: 5041571 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A critical evaluation of the vaginal irrigation kit as a screening method for the detection of cancer of the cervix. Anderson WA, Gunn SA. Acta Cytol; 1966 Jun 30; 10(3):149-53. PubMed ID: 5227363 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The early detection of unsuspected carcinoma of cervix in Malaysia by exfoliative cytological screening. Sinnathuray TA, Lau KS. Med J Malaysia; 1973 Dec 30; 28(2):70-4. PubMed ID: 4276263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Jet-irrigation method for the diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Its principle and accuracy. Gravlee LC. Obstet Gynecol; 1969 Aug 30; 34(2):168-72. PubMed ID: 5798259 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk of invasive cervical cancer after Pap smears: the protective effect of multiple negatives. Coldman A, Phillips N, Kan L, Matisic J, Benedet L, Towers L. J Med Screen; 2005 Aug 30; 12(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 15814014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Epidemiological aspects of detection of carcinoma of the cervix in the region of Ljubljana]. Kovacic J, Bonta S. Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Jan 15; 23(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 5553174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Report of 5 years of activity in the prevention of neoplasms of the uterus in the province of Trieste. Prevention, early diagnosis and therapy]. Spanio P, Segata L, Mastrangelo C. Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Feb 15; 23(3):119-23. PubMed ID: 5579728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Positive smears in previously screened patients (certain cytologic findings of public health importance). Liu W. Acta Cytol; 1967 Feb 15; 11(3):193-8. PubMed ID: 5232017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. HPV presence precedes abnormal cytology in women developing cervical cancer and signals false negative smears. Zielinski GD, Snijders PJ, Rozendaal L, Voorhorst FJ, van der Linden HC, Runsink AP, de Schipper FA, Meijer CJ. Br J Cancer; 2001 Aug 03; 85(3):398-404. PubMed ID: 11487272 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Pap smear screening history of women with squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the cervix. Pak SC, Martens M, Bekkers R, Crandon AJ, Land R, Nicklin JL, Perrin LC, Obermair A. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Dec 03; 47(6):504-7. PubMed ID: 17991118 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]