These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

123 related items for PubMed ID: 4690415

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Para-natal emotional adjustment. A prospective investigation of 165 women. II. The influence of background factors, psychiatric history, parental relations, and personality characteristics.
    Nilsson A, Almgren PE.
    Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl; 1970; 220():65-141. PubMed ID: 5280620
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Scales for assessment of diagnosis and severity of mental disorders.
    Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl; 1993; 372():1-87. PubMed ID: 8317228
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [Using projective tests in forensic psychiatry may lead to wrong conclusions. Only empirically tested tests should be used].
    Trygg L, Dåderman AM, Wiklund N, Meurling AW, Lindgren M, Lidberg L, Levander S.
    Lakartidningen; 2001 Jun 27; 98(26-27):3118-23. PubMed ID: 11478205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Evaluation of abnormal behavior by means of rating scales].
    Fano Cassese S, Castrogiovanni P.
    Arch Psicol Neurol Psichiatr; 1967 Jun 27; 28(5):411-67. PubMed ID: 6080198
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The need for tests of normal functioning in the psychiatric interview.
    Havens LL.
    Am J Psychiatry; 1984 Oct 27; 141(10):1208-11. PubMed ID: 6486253
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Standardised rating scales in psychiatry: methodological basis, their possibilities and limitations and descriptions of important rating scales.
    Möller HJ.
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2009 Oct 27; 10(1):6-26. PubMed ID: 18663668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. The clinical management the patient with dementia.
    Wells CE.
    Contemp Neurol Ser; 1971 Oct 27; 9():209-32. PubMed ID: 5317356
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The psychiatric review of symptoms: a screening tool for family physicians.
    Carlat DJ.
    Am Fam Physician; 1998 Nov 01; 58(7):1617-24. PubMed ID: 9824959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Psychopathometric methods: I. General part].
    Möller HJ, von Zerssen D.
    Nervenarzt; 1982 Sep 01; 53(9):493-503. PubMed ID: 7133249
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. A comparison of doctor and patient rating scales assessing psychopathology in three outpatient samples [proceedings].
    Jacobson AF, Brauzer B, Goldstein BJ.
    Psychopharmacol Bull; 1977 Apr 01; 13(2):15-7. PubMed ID: 859988
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Psychological health-sickness (PHS) as a predictor of outcomes in dynamic and other psychotherapies.
    Luborsky L, Diguer L, Luborsky E, McLellan AT, Woody G, Alexander L.
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1993 Aug 01; 61(4):542-8. PubMed ID: 8370850
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.