These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

130 related items for PubMed ID: 471508

  • 1. The otologic referral criteria for occupational hearing conservation programs. Medical Aspects of noise Committee. American Council of Otolaryngology.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):635-6. PubMed ID: 471508
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Standard threshold shift criteria. An investigation of the most reliable indicator of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Lane CL, Dobie RA, Crawford DR, Morgan MS.
    J Occup Med; 1985 Jan; 27(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 3968596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Otologic referral in industrial hearing conservation programs.
    Dobie RA, Archer RJ.
    J Occup Med; 1981 Nov; 23(11):755-61. PubMed ID: 7320774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Audiometric evaluation of noise induced hearing loss.
    Ruth RA.
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):639-54. PubMed ID: 471510
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Critical analysis of the effectiveness of secondary prevention of occupational hearing loss.
    Hétu R.
    J Occup Med; 1979 Apr; 21(4):251-4. PubMed ID: 438914
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Noise and hearing loss in firefighting.
    Tubbs RL.
    Occup Med; 1995 Apr; 10(4):843-56. PubMed ID: 8903753
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [Our audiometric criteria for the prevention of occupational hearing disorders].
    Tománek R, Sedlmajerová D.
    Cesk Otolaryngol; 1983 Jul; 32(4):230-8. PubMed ID: 6627462
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Hearing conservation in industry.
    Dobie RA.
    West J Med; 1982 Dec; 137(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 7164430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Noise induced hearing loss and the general practitioner.
    Goater I.
    Aust Fam Physician; 1980 Feb; 9(2):120-4. PubMed ID: 7362533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. [Occupational hearing loss: new diagnostic opportunities].
    Sułkowski WJ, Guzek WJ, Kowalska S, Matyja W, Sward-Matyja M.
    Med Pr; 2002 Feb; 53(6):457-9. PubMed ID: 12701535
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Noise-induced hearing loss and industrial audiometry.
    Somerville ET.
    J R Coll Gen Pract; 1976 Oct; 26(171):770-80. PubMed ID: 1003386
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Evaluation of and trends in hearing surveillance programs in industry].
    Malchaire J.
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1988 Oct; 42(4):529-37. PubMed ID: 3218500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Hearing conservation program adequacy can be measured before damage occurs.
    Peters LJ, Michael P.
    Occup Health Saf; 1987 Sep; 56(10):50, 52, 55 passim. PubMed ID: 3658300
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Industrial audiometry and the otologist.
    Dobie RA.
    Laryngoscope; 1985 Apr; 95(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 3982182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Hearing conservation: implementing and evaluating a program.
    Harrison RK.
    AAOHN J; 1989 Apr; 37(4):107-11. PubMed ID: 2518840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.