These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

126 related items for PubMed ID: 4749616

  • 21. Surgical treatment of combined aortic and mitral valvular disease. A clinical, haemodynamic and experimental evaluation of the standard and convexo-concave models of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis.
    Aberg B.
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Suppl; 1980; Suppl 25():1-60. PubMed ID: 6933689
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Effect of aortic valve replacement on the left ventricle. A ciné-angiographic evaluation.
    Lähde S, Takkunen J, Rajasalmi M, Linnaluoto M, Kärkölä P.
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1979; 13(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 542827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Evaluation of the 21 mm Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve in patients with narrow aortic roots. A clinical, haemodynamic and angiographic study.
    Björk VO, Henze A, Holmgren A, Szamosi A.
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1973; 7(3):203-13. PubMed ID: 4771126
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Long-term results with the Björk-Shiley tilting disk valve in aortic valvular disease.
    Björk VO, Henze A, Holmgren A.
    Isr J Med Sci; 1975; 11(2-3):161-72. PubMed ID: 46224
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Five years experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve in isolated aortic valvular disease.
    Björk VO, Henze A, Holmgren A.
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1975; 16(5):451-7. PubMed ID: 1194329
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. [Hemodynamic rest and stress studies following implantation of various aortic valve prostheses].
    Horstkotte D, Haerten K, Körfer R, Spiller P, Budde T, Bircks W, Loogen F.
    Z Kardiol; 1983 Aug; 72(8):429-37. PubMed ID: 6624185
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. The Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Echocardiographic findings.
    Escarous A.
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1975 Aug; 9(3):192-6. PubMed ID: 1209203
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Assessment of myocardial function].
    Rothlin M, Gattiker K.
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1973 Jun; 66(6):749-54. PubMed ID: 4199789
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. A hydrodynamic comparison between the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve and the Lillehei-Kaster pivoting disc valve.
    Björk VO, Olin C.
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1973 Jun; 7(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 4749615
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Haemodynamic performance of aortic pericardial bioprostheses and bileaflet prostheses at rest and during exercise: implications for the surgical management of patients with small aortic roots.
    González-Juanatey JR, Fernández MV, Sampedro FG, García-Acuña JM, García-Bengoechea JB, Cendon AA, de La Peña MG.
    Heart; 1999 Aug; 82(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 10409527
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Aortic valve replacement: two years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting-disc prosthesis.
    Messmer BJ, Okies JE, Hallman GL, Cooley DA.
    Surgery; 1972 Nov; 72(5):772-9. PubMed ID: 4672107
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Clinical experiences in 50 cases.
    Larmi TK, Kärkölä P, Takkunen J.
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1975 Nov; 9(2):85-9. PubMed ID: 1179200
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Combined aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve prosthesis. Early and late results in 75 consecutive patients.
    Aberg B, Henze A, Björk VO.
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1977 Nov; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 847416
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34. Serial assessment of ventricular performance after valve replacement for aortic stenosis.
    Harpole DH, Jones RH.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 Apr; 99(4):645-50. PubMed ID: 2319785
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35. Hemodynamics alterations induced by isoproterenol and pacing after aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley or St. Jude medical prosthesis.
    Thormann J, Gottwik M, Schlepper M, Hehrlein F.
    Circulation; 1981 Apr; 63(4):895-904. PubMed ID: 7471345
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Optimal insertion technique for the Björk-Shiley valve in the narrow aortic ostium.
    Olin CL, Bomfim V, Halvazulis V, Holmgren AG, Lamke BJ.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1983 Nov; 36(5):567-76. PubMed ID: 6357126
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. Clinical and hemodynamic findings following prosthetic valve replacement for mitral valve disease. A study of patients with the new Björk-Shiley tilting disc valve.
    Nitter-Hauge S, Froysaker T, Hall KV.
    Acta Med Scand; 1976 Nov; 200(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 970228
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Aortic valve replacement: One-year results with Lillehei-Kaster and Bjork-Shiley disc prosthesis. A comparative clinical study.
    Nitter-Hauge S, Hall KV, Froysaker T, Efskind L.
    Am Heart J; 1974 Jul; 88(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 4406985
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Hemodynamic changes after valve replacement with Starr-Edwards prostheses.
    Bristow JD, Kremkau EL.
    Am J Cardiol; 1975 May; 35(5):716-24. PubMed ID: 1124728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Rest and exercise hemodynamics following aortic valve replacement. A comparison between 19 and 21 mm Ionescu-Shiley pericardial and Carpentier-Edwards porcine valves.
    Bove EL, Marvasti MA, Potts JL, Reger MJ, Zamora JL, Eich RH, Parker FB.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):750-5. PubMed ID: 4058047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.