These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


150 related items for PubMed ID: 4815516

  • 1. Does post-exposural directional scanning offer a sufficient explanation for lateral differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    McKeever WF.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Feb; 38(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 4815516
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Does cerebral dominance offer a sufficient explanation for laterality differences in tachistoscopic recognition?
    White MJ.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Apr; 36(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 4690737
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Hemispheric asymmetries in tachistoscopic information-processing.
    White MJ.
    Br J Psychol; 1972 Nov; 63(4):497-508. PubMed ID: 4574450
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Integration of post-exposural directional scanning and cerebral dominance explanations of lateral differences in trachistoscopic recognition.
    Fudin R, Masterson CC.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):355-9. PubMed ID: 1272678
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Visual masking, handedness, and laterality.
    Luria SM.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):803-11. PubMed ID: 4842435
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Tachistoscopic word recognition performance under conditions of simultaneous bilateral presentation.
    Mackavey W, Curcio F, Rosen J.
    Neuropsychologia; 1975 Jan; 13(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 1109458
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Hemifield differences in binocular fusion.
    Carmon A, Nachshon I.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Feb; 36(1):175-84. PubMed ID: 4686707
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Laterality differences in tachistoscopic word recognition in normal and delayed readers in elementary school.
    Olson ME.
    Neuropsychologia; 1973 Jul; 11(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 4792185
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Interhemispheric effects on choice reaction times to one-, two-, and three-letter displays.
    Umiltá C, Frost N, Hyman R.
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Apr; 93(1):198-204. PubMed ID: 5013334
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Analysis of superiority of the right visual field in bilateral tachistoscopic word-recognition.
    Fudin R.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Dec; 43(3 pt. 1):683-8. PubMed ID: 1012856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Extraneous lateral stimulation and distribution of errors within tachistoscopic patterns.
    Nice DS.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):1234. PubMed ID: 4711975
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Relative attensity of stimuli in left and right visual hemifields.
    Kirssin JE, Harcum ER.
    Percept Mot Skills; 1967 Jun; 24(3):807-22. PubMed ID: 5622770
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.