These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Guidelines for audiometric symbols. Committee on Audiologic Evaluation. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association. ASHA Suppl; 1990 Apr; (2):25-30. PubMed ID: 1970250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Useful hearing tests in the otorhinolaryngologic treatment]. Eube H, Gronau A. Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1976 May 15; 70(10):520-7. PubMed ID: 952012 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Speech audiometry with sentences and noise (author's transl)]. Schultz-Coulon HJ. Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1974 Oct 15; 53(10):734-49. PubMed ID: 4444388 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Masked speech audiometry in central deafness. Morales-Garcia C, Poole JP. Acta Otolaryngol; 1972 Nov 15; 74(5):307-16. PubMed ID: 4639723 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Development and evaluation of the British English coordinate response measure speech-in-noise test as an occupational hearing assessment tool. Semeraro HD, Rowan D, van Besouw RM, Allsopp AA. Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct 15; 56(10):749-758. PubMed ID: 28537138 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. [Expediency of applying speech audiometry by bone conductivity for the diagnosis of the status of the receptor apparatus of the cochlea]. Dunaĭvitser BI. Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1969 Oct 15; 29(4):7-12. PubMed ID: 5387132 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of the nonorganic hearing loss suspect. Durrant JD, Kesterson RK, Kamerer DB. Am J Otol; 1997 May 15; 18(3):361-7. PubMed ID: 9149832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses. Carhart R, Tillman TW. Arch Otolaryngol; 1970 Mar 15; 91(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 5414080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations. Aniansson G. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974 Mar 15; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Long-term clinical results of the partially implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant. Suzuki J, Kodera K, Nagai K, Yabe T. Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb 15; 73(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 8168441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Interaural attenuation characteristics in audiometry. Snyder JM. Laryngoscope; 1973 Nov 15; 83(11):1847-55. PubMed ID: 4758145 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone conduction speech discrimination: an indication of cochlear function in the immediate postoperative period. Robinson M, Kasden SD. Arch Otolaryngol; 1977 Apr 15; 103(4):238-40. PubMed ID: 849203 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Proceedings: Audiometry in newborn infants and infants using the 6-msec-potential]. Giesen M, Rudolph N. Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1973 Dec 17; 205(2):238-42. PubMed ID: 4785505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Differential effect of conductive hearing loss on the threshold-duration function. Wright HN, Cannella F. J Speech Hear Res; 1969 Sep 17; 12(3):607-15. PubMed ID: 5811851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of white noise on PB scores of normal and hearing-impaired listeners. Keith RW, Talis HP. Audiology; 1972 Sep 17; 11(3):177-86. PubMed ID: 4669918 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]